• PKMKII [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    10 months ago

    Even if you consider absolutely every part of the USSR not part of modern day Russia a former colony, that’s still an absolutely tiny fraction of the colonizing Spain, France, England, etc did.

    • Hello_Kitty_enjoyer [none/use name]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      10 months ago

      Russia’s colonialism in land amount is comparable to France/England. Anything East of the Urals was never Russia before the 1600s

      of course all of this happened before the USSR and has nothing to do with it, the twitter guy is a moron

      And it’s also undebatable that Siberian Natives were treated better than American ones. Although you can also chalk this up to them having better weapons and disease resistance

      • Collatz_problem [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        10 months ago

        Siberian Natives were hit pretty hard by smallpox, but they recovered, because Russian policy was “pay taxes and we’ll fuck off”, not “we’ll kill you all and settle your land”.

  • Rod_Blagojevic [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Part of the massive rewrite of soviet history that has happened in my lifetime is that all of the peoples of the non-Russian republics did not experience genuine class conflict and mass uprisings that led them to be part of the USSR. Nobody actually wanted rapidly developed, shared prosperity. The forces that overthrew the reactionary elites of Central Asia and Eastern Europe didn’t actually exist, or they all came from Russia. It’s just Jim Crow “outside agitator” rhetoric filtered through the last bit of acceptable liberal racism.

    The scope of acceptable racism will soon start expand rapidly. We’re gonna need a lot of hated outsiders to blame the next capitalist crises on. Get ready, Ireland.

  • Owl [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    10 months ago

    I read this guy’s blog. It’s amazing how he has a a fully materialist viewpoint focused on the way governments treat the common laborer, until the US is founded, after which his views switch to pure idealistic drivel.

  • dinklesplein [any, he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    oh yeah, bret devereaux. take a lot at his twitter bio lmfao, emphasis mine:

    Ancient & military historian specializing in the Roman economy and military. PhD @UNChistory. More impressive credential is that I have beaten Dark Souls.

    gamer-gulag when? ‘I beat le heckin DARK SOULS!’

  • barrbaric [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    10 months ago

    Lol I remember reading this guy’s blog (focusing mostly on ancient history) and occasionally just stumbling onto hilarious anti-communism like this. One of my favorites was when he decided to do an article on guerilla warfare and spent like 3 paragraphs saying “Mao was an awful person, perhaps the worst to ever exist, and I disavow everything he ever said or did. That said, he is also one of the main sources for modern guerilla tactics and his theory of positional warfare was partially correct.”