• davel [he/him]@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    57
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    I’m not a fan of meme-level infographics of unsourced data.

    US unemployment figures virtually never include those who have given up on looking for work, which is a drastic undercounting. Biden’s Misleading Unemployment Statistic

    Who knows where the Cuban unemployment figure came from, or how it was calculated or the quality of the data.

    • Sarcasmo220@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      7 months ago

      Blackouts are certainly a thing, and for the middle class in USA that would be considered intolerable. However, for the poor in the USA who sometimes go without electricity for lack of payment, having access to healthcare and education in exchange for the occasional blackout might be worth the trade.

      As for speaking out against the government, citizens may not be incarcerated for speaking out (unless it actually threatens the government such as Manning, Snowden, and Winner), other forms of control are used. Usually that means pervasive propaganda and pitting people against each other through the Culture War.

    • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      7 months ago

      US has the highest incarceration per capita in the world, and it’s far higher than Cuba. Meanwhile, the blockade of Cuba certainly does make things difficult for a small island. The fact that people of Cuba enjoy higher quality of life than Americans in many ways, shows how communism can persevere even under harshest conditions. Not the own you seem to think it is.

  • lud@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    What about freedom of press and expression?

      • lud@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        I don’t think they did a bad thing but of course the government doesn’t like that they leak classified information.

        Either way, it’s irrelevant when it is so much worse in Cuba.

        And you can ask pretty much every reputable international human rights organisation or press freedom organisation.

        • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          It’s very much relevant because it shows that every government will censor information that it finds threatening. There is a long history of censorship in the west just like everywhere else. The real difference is what sort of things are censored. In Cuba, censorship focuses on preventing a capitalist counterrevolution.

  • SSJ2Marx [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    for “foreign interventions” I would do something like, “10 million killed since 1947” vs “ended Apartheid” instead of what you got there.

    • OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      So they can buy less commodities but generally still manage to live longer lives, are more able to read which means they can pursue intellectual and cultural pursuits, etc?

      Sounds like a good trade, I bet it would be an even better trade without the blockade.

      • I’m not saying life on balance is necessarily worse or better. Just pointing out that cherry-picking statistics can sketch a wrong image.

        “Less commodities” sounds a bit dismissive of the difference though. It is significantly less, e.g. the average salary is less than 190 USD per month. Most Cubans struggle to get enough food to get by, and whilst there are measures to avoid starvation, they’re not exactly having much to eat either. They’re not using their time for intellectual/cultural pursuits, most use their time to find additional sources of income.

        Healthcare is free, but the equipment is old. Outcomes are poorer, due to lack of drugs. Cuba has an excellent HIV-program, with mandatory testing and cheap antivirals. Yet, HIV cases (and STIs in general) are on the rise due to a high prevalence of prostitution, caused by the low salaries and high wealth inequality.

        Upsides and downsides. Reality is that several hundreds of thousands of Cubans attempt to flee the country every year. Between 2021 and 2023, nearly 500k people tried to do so, ~5% of the population. That’s not very indicative of a place-to-be.

        It may well be true that the US embargo is causing a lot of these issues. However, economists tend to argue that the lack of Soviet subsidies has a much larger negative effect.

        I’m not so sure it’s a good trade. There are things we can learn, certainly. But on balance, it doesn’t seem better.

    • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      7 months ago

      You forgot to factor in the cost of housing, healthcare, and education that people in Cuba don’t have to worry about.

      • vargr616@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        7 months ago

        please go anywhere in cuba, proclaim this as loud as you can, and count down how long before you’ll be arrested for being an agitator or an undesireable.

        • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          Are you under the impression that the Cuban government would prefer not to be referred to as a dictatorship of the proletariat? Do you have a base-level familiarity with Marxist terminology, such as the fact that liberal democracy is referred to as the dictatorship of the bourgeoisie?

          Dictatorship of the _ just refers to what class is in power, not if it’s a totalitarian dystopia or anything.

  • lud@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    7 months ago

    Yes, there is a long history but fortunately we live in the present.

    Restricting peoples opinions is a very horrible thing to do. It doesn’t matter if it’s to “preventing a capitalist counterrevolution” which is you a bunch of bullshit made up because they want to repres people.

      • lud@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        Can you explain why people shouldn’t be able to express their opinions?

        Pretty much everyone and every human right group thinks so, except people on Lemmy.ml, lemmygrad and hexbear. For some they like censorship but only for their advantage which is ludicrous.

        I am not for absolutism because in some cases it can be disallowed. But only for very specific reasons and that the government is afraid of different ideologies isn’t a valid reason.

        • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          here, educate yourself https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paradox_of_tolerance

          I am not for absolutism because in some cases it can be disallowed. But only for very specific reasons and that the government is afraid of different ideologies isn’t a valid reason.

          It sure is when the government represents the interests of the working majority. And the government is the only body that can decide what speech is or isn’t allowed, so your whole statement is self contradictory. If you accept that some speech is harmful and needs to be suppressed, then it becomes a question of degrees. And westerners thinking that they got the level of censorship fundamentally right while everyone else has it wrong is just plain old chauvinism. Western societies are currently the most polarized societies with some of the lowest levels of social cohesion. Anybody looking at the west and thinking that this is a good model should get their head checked.

          • lud@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            7 months ago

            I understand the link you posted and I knew you’d post it. Generally the western societies you hate is very for free speech and tolerance. The world you want is generally very against that. Socialism doesn’'t have to be, but for some reason you guys want that. Which is frankly insane.

            If we go by the paradox shouldn’t western societies ban socialism speech?

            If your opponent respects your opinion and doesn’t censor you, you should do the same.

            A great government shouldn’t have to censor the opinions of its citizens if they are truly so great.

            And no a government doesn’t have to be great just because it doesn’t censor, but a government can’t be great if it censors.

            If you disagree that’s currently fine.

            And westerners thinking that they got the level of censorship fundamentally right while everyone else has it wrong is just plain old chauvinism.

            You want more censorship that’s oppressing your opponents from expressing their opinion because you think you are objectively right and everyone else is wrong. I think it’s enough to ban hate speech. There is a huge difference there.

            I can’t believe I’m here arguing with you guys again. It’s useless because you guys are so far up your own asses that you can’t hear a ship horn. I’m not against socialism per se but you certainly don’t make a good case for anyone reasonable to support it.

            • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              7 months ago

              Again, there is nothing to support the assertion that the level of speech tolerance in western societies is desirable or a net positive on society as a whole. You are a product of a particular society which plays an anchoring effect in what you consider to be the right level of free speech. This alone is not a rational basis for deciding that this is fundamentally the right amount of free speech we should strive for.

              I can’t believe that this such is a difficult concept for free speech zealots to wrap their head around.