Remember to use ad blockers and DNS filters ladies and gentlemen!

Have no idea what Otto[.]de is, nor do I have any plans to find out. But god damn thats a long as time. Its the equivalent of 9993 years if anyone was wondering…

Source; Cookie of a sketchy free VPN that I’m investigating.

    • Sunny' 🌻@slrpnk.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Which is great, but do you know if that the case for Android apps too? As that is the case in this scenario?

  • CarbonatedPastaSauce@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    If you don’t have your browser set to delete all cookies you haven’t made exceptions for, every time you close it, I don’t know what to tell you. Except… “you should do that”.

    • DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      6 months ago

      I use Firefox temporary containers. So not only are they deleted 5 mins after I close a tab, but different tabs don’t share cookies unless I explicitly allow it or the tabs are opened from one source (e.g. open link in new tab)

        • DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          6 months ago

          It does not seem available on mobile. On desktop, it is an extension called “Temporary Containers”. You may also want the official “Firefox Multi-Account Containers” for managing sites where you want to stay logged in.

  • barsoap@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Speaking about sketchy and durations…

    The certificate for slrpnk.net expired on 5/6/2024.

    Error code: SEC_ERROR_EXPIRED_CERTIFICATE

  • Björn Tantau@swg-empire.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    6 months ago

    I guess they are not using php.

    First time I encountered a Y2038 bug in the wild. And apparently they still did not fix it for some inane reason.

  • marcos@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    6 months ago

    There isn’t any reason for a site to limit the lifetime of most cookies. I have no idea why that field isn’t optional.

    Get an extension that will erase the cookies that you don’t care about, do not abide by everything anybody on the web asks you for. And yeah, get an ad-blocker.

    • hydroptic@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      At least here in the EU the ePrivacy directive and to a lesser extent the GDPR generally require that cookies have a limited lifetime depending on their function, to eg. prevent companies just attaching a stable identifier to every random passerby essentially forever. @[email protected], if you’re feeling particularly mildly infuriated you could email the German Data Protection Authority, there’s a good chance the cookie could attract the Eye of Sauron

      • Sunny' 🌻@slrpnk.netOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 months ago

        I’m not annoyed, I’m not using this VPN service, only doing research. However, I would appreciate it if you could link me to what you refer to with GDPR and ePrivacy setting a limited cookie lifetime!

        • hydroptic@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          Sure! This page has some general info: https://gdpr.eu/cookies/

          The directive itself is kind of involved because it goes pretty deep into what its aim is and eg. what sort of information can be considers an identifier, and it’s actually quite well argued and worth a read if that sort of thing is your, er, thing: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX%3A32002L0058 (you need to scoll aaalll the way down to be able to show the body text). I had to deal with this stuff professionally when I was a CTO for a company with some stricter than average privacy requirements due to the field, and I was pleasantly surprised to find out how much sense ePrivacy and GDPR actually make

      • FMEEE@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Jes but the company showed in OPs Image is a cookie of a German company. Otto de is like a German Amazon. And it is a GmbH so it’s probably registered in Germany.

    • Björn Tantau@swg-empire.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 months ago

      I have no idea why that field isn’t optional.

      It is. But leaving it off means that the cookie will be removed when the browser is shut down.

    • barsoap@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      6 months ago

      OTTO is an age-old German mail order company, they started up in 1949. About 16bn yearly revenue. Second largest online retailer overall in Germany after amazon, larger than amazon in Europe when it comes to clothing. Which TBH actually surprised me I thought zalando had that one nailed down.

      They also own their own parcel service (Hermes). Are they sketchy? Yes, I mean they’re turbo capitalists so of course they are. More so than amazon, nope.

      • PostnataleAbtreibung@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        They were, like Quelle, one of those mail order companies well before Internet and Amazon. They were once even quite acceptable.

        They turned to the very worst, though. If you have a problem, then YOU have the problem. Parcel missing? Well, good luck. Goods are damaged? Nope.