Transcription: A picture of a bat leaning against some stumps. Superimposed on it is a Tweet from Iceland Cricket: “Name a rule in cricket that should be changed immediately. Why?”

  • mutant_zz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    You shouldn’t be run out at the non-strikers end if the batter hits it and it deflects off the bowler or other fielder. The bowler/fielder should have to have a degree of control for it to count as a run out, which could just be changing the trajectory of the ball slightly. But putting your hand out and grazing a finger is not enough

    • _thisdot@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Degree of control is too hard to define. You should take away keeper catches where the ball doesn’t deviate too much either in that case

      • mutant_zz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        You already have to have a degree of control to complete a catch (which is nothing to do with how much the ball deviates off the bat).

        Umpires already have to make a lot of judgement calls in cricket. This would be no different.

    • Zagorath@aussie.zoneOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Oh interesting. I’ve never seen that suggested before. What I have seen is that after you do a coin toss for game 1 of a series, you alternate on subsequent games. Might achieve a similar result, without being quite so extreme.

  • Zagorath@aussie.zoneOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    I saw this on the Cricket Australia Facebook page. The comments over there are not very good. Some just blatantly bad ideas (first one I saw: “No more leg byes! You should have to hit the ball to score runs, not miss it.”) some that are not actually suggesting changes to the laws of cricket (“Mankad completely legal and regarded as a legitimate tactic of the game”).

    Can we do better?

  • SanguinePar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    Not sure which rule it would be, but I think back to the 2019 World Cup final, and that ball that hit the bat of Ben Stokes as he dived to get safely back into his wicket.

    Not only did he get there, but the ball went for 4, and given the extremely close result and the lateness of that over, it might have made all the difference.

    Not sure what you would need to change it to, but it seemed very unfair to me that England got those runs.