• Anarch157a@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    This has been the law in Brazil for more than 10 years now. We have lots of problems here, but at least our consumer protection laws are top notch. And, believe or not, they’re enforced successfully.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      It feels a bit “least we could do” ish?

      They’re not setting standard size scales for basic products or establishing price floors based on wholesale/production costs, much less intervening to increase supply or reduce overhead costs.

      This is a bit like the surgeon generals warning on a pack of cigarettes. Nice, I guess. But hardly a game changer.

  • Liz@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    Really we just need to standardize sizes for consumer goods. For example: drinks can come in 250, 500, 750, 1000, and 2000 mL sizes. Sold soap must be sold in units of 100, 500, or 1000 grams. And so on…

    • ironhydroxide@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      But then you get shrinkflation in the product itself. Less emulsifiers in the soap, drinks with corn syrup replacing sugar, and powders like cinnamon cut with lead powder.

      Not saying it couldn’t be done, just that businesses are really incentivised to find the loopholes and exploit them.

  • UnPassive@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    At this point I just stopped buying chips. Feels like such a waste to fill the bag less than half way…