• Justas🇱🇹@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 months ago

    First they came for the socialists, and I did not speak out— Because I was not a socialist.

    Then they came for the trade unionists, and I did not speak out— Because I was not a trade unionist.

    Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out— Because I was not a Jew.

    Then they came for me—and there was no one left to speak for me.

    • CitizenKong@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 months ago

      This is a quote by Martin Niemöller, a German theologian who spent eight years in concentration camps towards the end of WW2 and who afterwards publicly spoke out a about the dangers of complacency in the face of fascism.

    • retrospectology@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      First they helped fund a literal genocide, and I did not speak out—

      Because it wasn’t my realtives being killed by US bombs and I was afraid that standing up and doing the right thing would have costs for me personally.

  • Empricorn@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 months ago

    Day one!!!” I’m not even LGBTQ, but that’s the Republican Nominee saying his main priority is to hurt minorities. For no gain, just spite. If you know someone with “Conservative” tendencies, you owe it to everyone in this country to talk to them about this…

    • barsquid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      They have conservative tendencies because they want other people to be harmed by face-eating leopards.

      • return2ozma@lemmy.world
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        They are chicken shit cowards who are too comfortable going with the flow. Also, brain dead.

  • Delusional@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 months ago

    “I will attack these Americans on day one.”

    Oh gee thanks asshole. How does anyone think that is okay at all.

      • EvilEyedPanda@lemmy.world
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        I remember that Bible verse:

        Jesus said, “Let the little children come to me, and do not hinder them, for the kingdom of heaven belongs to such as these… unless their LGBTQIA+”

  • kescusay@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    My son is trans. Please vote for Joe Biden so he can have the protections he needs and I don’t have to stay up at night worrying about him.

    • jeffw@lemmy.worldOPM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Friendly reminder that everyone who believes in accelerationist BS is privileged af.

      Looking at you, Hexbear… and Lemmy.ml people who deleted my comments yesterday calling out Hexbear as tankies

      Sadly, the behavior isn’t limited to certain instances though

      • MagicPterodactyl@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Hey not everyone from ml is a dipshit. Some of us just stumbled into ml because it was a stable and popular instance when we joined.

        Hexbear on the other hand? I don’t think you would just accidentally join that place, at least not without getting banned the first time you say something against their pro fascist hive mind.

        • jeffw@lemmy.worldOPM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          I just had another comment on ml deleted today for saying some people on ml are bootlickers. Becoming less and less of a fan lately

        • catloaf@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Someone who thinks we should have the worst right now and get it over with.

        • prayer@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          The idea that we cannot have real change without some for of revolution, so we should make things go to their extreme, and cause some kind of cultural revolution.

          • ramble81@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            I see. I understand that as a path, but that seems like the “option of last resort” to me, and these guys want to make it the proposed one?

            • tsonfeir@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              Fake communists. Hexbears. It’s just Anarchy, but the “fuck everything” type of anarchy.

              I understand the frustration and desire to burn everything down, but I just think that’s lazy and won’t end up working at all.

              • Eldritch@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 months ago

                Those are just nihilist. Actual anarchist generally aren’t the fuck shit up kind. Those are generally angsty young teens with very little understanding.

                You are however 100% right about lemmy.ml. hexbear and Lemmygrad. They are all Marxist leninist. Which was an ill-conceived transitory authoritarian style anti communist government that was supposed to facilitate the build up to and transition to communism. But not communist itself. Which has failed everywhere it’s ever been tried. Much like capitalism if you go by it’s stated goals and ideals.

                They love to blather on and on and on about communism and how great and wonderful it would be. And it would be. But everything they do is actually in opposition to it so they are very much fake/ performatory communists.

                • Mossy Feathers (They/Them)@pawb.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  I hate that “Marxism-Leninism” refers to the brand of communism and socialism that Stalin practiced. It should be called “Stalinism”. From the little I know about Marx and Lenin is that Marx had some good ideas and while Lenin had some bad policies, he also had a genuine interest in trying to do what was best for Russia. Meanwhile Stalin let millions starve.

                  Also Marxist-Leninism is doomed to fail imo. I believe that in order for socialism to truly succeed, you must ensure that the world’s leading countries practice socialism; or at least ensure that your country is capable of fulfilling every step in the supply chain for any given good for now and the future, either by itself or via allies. Attempting to do it on your own like Marxist-Leninism suggests, is a road to failure because capitalism will attempt to starve you (and likely succeed at doing so).

                  Capitalism is inherently opposed to socialism because the true end game of capitalism is for an individual, or group of individuals, to own everything. However, they can’t own everything if a country’s culture is opposed to that form of selfishness. Additionally, the capitalist’s peasants might get funny ideas if they see a country based on mutual goodwill succeeding. Stalin played right into the hands of capitalists. He deserves to have the inherently flawed and doomed-to-fail ideology named after him.

                  Fuck, I barely got any sleep last night and I can’t tell if I’m being coherent or not. Additionally, now I have a conspiracy theory that this was all intentional. Tying a form of socialism that was oppressive and doomed to fail to Marx and Lenin was an intentional move by capitalists to conflate Stalin’s garbage with a legitimate desire and attempt to create a better world. By doing so, you create the belief that even Lenin and Marx supported oppression and that oppression is therefore inherently a part of socialism and communism. As such, by calling themselves Marxist-Leninists, they are falling into a trap created by capitalists to defame such ideologies like communism and socialism.

                  Also I wanted to make a comment about how capitalism is like economic heroin or something: extremely enticing and addictive; but I’ve got no clue where to put it.

                • tsonfeir@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  To be politely pedantic, while I agree generally, in the defense of nihilists, not all of them want to actively burn it down. They just don’t care and nothing matters. It’s the unique combination of anger and anti-establishment that makes the type of person we are talking about. And if they care enough to burn it down, I’d argue they can’t be a nihilist by definition.

          • Gigasser@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            No, it’s people who think accelerating the country into a hyper capitalist fascist hellhole will lead to the accelerated collapse of the capitalist system. Then revolution will bring the promised land to them. Of course they don’t realize that collapse isn’t necessarily guaranteed.

    • Fire Witch@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      I’ve been a trans woman for 10 years and an immigrant for much longer. This is one of the worst existential threats I’ve faced. I have had to sit down and discuss serious contingency plans with my partner if he wins because there is no chance I’m sticking around.

      I just want to exist dammit. I’m tired of being persecuted for simply existing.

    • 0110010001100010@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      I am very good friends with a trans women who I worked with for a number of years. She is seriously considering leaving the US because of this bullshit. So yes, please vote for Biden.

      Also, I hope you son is doing well! It’s a hell of a process.

      • Mossy Feathers (They/Them)@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        I want to leave the US but I honestly don’t know how. I have no idea if I have any skills that’d let me get hired by a non-us company, which is kinda what’s necessary to immigrate to another country, right?

        • daltotron@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          there’s also the idea that you go to a college, possibly a community college, and then transfer to an out of country college for the degree, which I have heard is a great way to be able to live in a country, acclimate, and work from there

        • humbletightband@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          You can leave the US, open entrepreneurship in the other country, and have a remote contract between this legal entity and a US company.

      • Lemminary@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        My best friend is trans and he’s considering doing the same. It’s so bullshit that he has to leave an entire life behind because the conservatwats are so hateful.

        • smeenz@lemmy.nz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          It’s slightly comforting to think that after they’ve forced every group out of the country with their hatred and vitriol, they’ll eventually start eating themselves.

      • Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Most people are unable to flee the U.S. Most countries will not simply accept someone without meeting specific criteria.

  • TengoHipo@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    He says a lot of things. A lot of it is verbal diarrhea to keep his crazy followers to keep following.

  • cordlesslamp@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    If Joe Biden hasn’t done anything, then why does Trump have so many things to revoke and reverse?

    Feel like almost every day there’s a headline about something new that Trump promised to reverse (for the worse).

  • Burninator05@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    What the hell makes him think he’ll be president again? If he loses the election he won’t be president. If he wins the election Biden can just refuse to leave office. It’s legal because everything a president does is legal. There is litterally a case before the SC where Trump is making that argument.

    • MrBusiness@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Supreme Court is dragging their feet on that decision. Probably not gonna decide til after the election. If Trump wins they’ll decide presidents get total immunity, but if Biden wins they shoot it down.

      • deaf_fish@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        The big funny would be if they decided that Trump was legal before Biden left office. The lights would go out when they came back on a lot of people would be disappeared.

        • barsquid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Biden wouldn’t do that. Granting total immunity would end US democracy, so I’d like to see Biden firing shots from the bow of the rapidly sinking ship. But I doubt it would turn out like that.

  • candyman337@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    This dude needs to stop getting coverage, the fact that he’s allowed to run for president is an affront to democracy.

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    For such an incredibly lazy person, he sure is planning to do a lot “on day one.”

    This is starting to have “lock her up” vibes.

    • jeffw@lemmy.worldOPM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      I just had a disagreement with someone on Lemmy a couple days ago who said Biden did nothing for the LGBTQ+ community. Maybe we just need more Trump headlines to educate people? Y’know, since they don’t read headlines about Biden

      • DarkThoughts@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Biden did a lot of good shit. People saying he’s the same or even worse than Trump have completely lost the plot or are just RuZZian bots / useful idiots parroting RuZZian propaganda.

        • retrospectology@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          He certainly has passed a lot of pork and convinced low information voters that it’s something to celebrate, yeah.

            • retrospectology@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              I can translate you you need: the legislation that he passed has nice names but in reality each bill is filled with spending for corporations and special interests (colloquially known as ‘pork barrel spending’).

              For example his climate change bill has subsidies and payouts for the coal industry, his CHIPs Act had no oversight or specification about how the money should be spent etc. Biden has approved more oil and drilling contracts than even Trump.

              Many Democratic voters get their information from big corporate media outlets, who have a vested interest in protecting corporate interests themselves. These voters end up recieving very little factual information to base their decisions on, and instead end up thinking Biden has “Done a lot of good” because they were given a vague feeling that he has by the corporate media.

              • enbyecho@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 months ago

                You are clearly not well informed. Are you not American?

                Presidents don’t make legislation. They don’t introduce bills and except in unusual circumstances are expected to sign them. They can’t modify them.

                Secondly, your claims that there is a bill that subsidizes the coal industry is without a source. Please provide a reference to this bill as “climate change bill” is to vague for me to know which you mean.

                Thirdly, your claim that the CHIPs Act has no oversight is incorrect. Here’s a helpful quote from a helpful FAQ provided by the Congressional Research Service:

                Congress may wish to exercise its oversight authority with respect to implementation of the programs and policies in the act and their effectiveness in addressing U.S. economic and national security concerns. Among other potential oversight issues: the allocation of incentive funding among various types of chip manufacturing (e.g., logic chips and memory chips, mature chips and leading-edge chips); the adequacy of funding to meet the act’s objectives; and the effectiveness of guardrails established in the act to prevent the use of incentive funding from enabling further investments in countries of concern or from being used for stock buybacks or dividends.

                My suggestion, for future reference, is that if you are going to make claims you source them. They will be much more forceful and factual and you won’t sound like you have vague feelings about something.

                • retrospectology@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 months ago

                  The president does have the ability to block legislation, it’s why you often hear it referred to the president signing various items into law.

                  My suggestion, for future reference, is that if you are going to make claims you source them. They will be much more forceful and factual and you won’t sound like you have vague feelings about something.

              • DarkThoughts@fedia.io
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 months ago

                That has very little to do with my statement. I’m very much aware of Biden’s shortcomings, I’m just not as delusional to think that Trump would be the better, let alone a good option here. And if we look at it historically he’s still, for what it’s worth, one of the better US presidents too.

                The climate topic is just a mess anyway, because ultimately neither politicians, CEO’s, nor voters actually want actual climate action being taken, because of how it would affect them. It’s simply too late at this point to have sufficient climate action without major repercussions, so people rather live out their remaining comfy life and blend out what it means for younger people (who are, small minority aside, just as deluded on that topic) and future generations.

        • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          They’re using the classic Republican move of encouraging abstaining from voting by highlighting Biden’s poor decisions. Trump’s supporters will vote him in if enough abstain. Inaction is action.

        • Trollception@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          It’s like half of the general population supports him, and the other half supports Biden. Who would have thought different opinions on the topic would arise in a public forum.

          • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            It’s like half of the general population supports him, and the other half supports Biden.

            Less than a quarter support Trump.

            The bigger problem is that almost thalf of the population doesn’t vote at all.

            • Trollception@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              2 months ago

              How can the polls show trump ahead and only a quarter support Trump? Are you saying most democrats don’t vote and only Republicans do?

              • femtech@midwest.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 months ago

                Yes, also polls call landlines. What demographic of people have landlines and will sit in the phone answering questions.

                • Trollception@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  Okay fine. I’ll accept that. How do you know that he has 25% of the vote? Is there some other method other than polls to determine support? Genuinely curious what your logic behind the numbers are and where 25% comes from. I just feel like both sides are so entrenched in their opinions on their party that they can’t possibly think there are people who would support the other.

        • weeeeum@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Nah, I think Republicans are so deranged that they would be convinced any shortcomings are some deep state, woke, FBI, Democrat sabotage.

            • weeeeum@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              I mean, I speak from experience. I personally know a lot of Republicans (all boomers) and they would genuinely believe that. At every opportunity they are talking about the deep state, some woke shit and how corrupt the FBI is, and how there’s this massive conspiracy to assassinate trump. They all have a nearly religious view of him saying that if he dies, he’d be a “martyr” for Republicans, so that the “silent majority” will finally take a stand.

            • Natanael@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              When it comes to Trump it’s literally only naive, stupid or evil that are possible explanations. All are bad.

  • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Great. Now he’s telling them trans people don’t count. They were already acting viciously. Now Dear Leader has officially endorsed them. Fucker.

    • Fire Witch@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      And Caitlyn Jenner will STILL brag about how amazing he is and how much she loves him

      I really wish people would stop taking her seriously