• oehm@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    It seems that they never intended to enforce this to current gun owners because they knew they wouldn’t comply. It is more of a measure that they will enforce going forward on future generations of gun owners.

    • Wrench@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      At the very least, they should be slam dunks for crime enhancements. If they commit a crime, and the illegal firearm is found in their possession, that should tack on some hefty penalties.

  • shalafi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    So what are you gonna do? Send the cops to kill them? Because that’s how it plays out.

    And then there’s the apocryphal boating accident. Prove I still have the guns.

      • Buelldozer@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        That has happened many many times and a few times in the past few years the homeowner has even gotten away with it.

    • Beetlejuice001@lemmy.wtf
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      License, insurance and registration (just like cars) for every gun. Massive fines with accruing interest lifetime liability for “lost” guns.

      • CarbonatedPastaSauce@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        What about stolen guns?

        If you carve out an exception then everyone will just say they were stolen.

        And if you don’t carve out an exception, you are now punishing people for a crime they didn’t commit.

        • Beetlejuice001@lemmy.wtf
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          If the gun was properly stored and secured it would not have been stolen. You must not be paying attention to justice in America. Many people are punished present day for crimes they didn’t commit.

    • AbidanYre@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      If you jump straight to shooting when cops show up to take your toys, it’s a pretty good bet you never should have had them in the first place.

      If you “lost” it they should tear your fucking house apart with a warrant to make sure it’s really gone.

      • BassaForte@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        We cool with police and government just barging into our homes and taking our property that we purchased legally with our own money now?

        EDIT: FWIW, I misunderstood the title. I thought it was banned guns, not people banned from having guns (due to felonies, etc.). This is a bit different.

      • CarbonatedPastaSauce@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        If you “lost” it they should tear your fucking house apart with a warrant to make sure it’s really gone.

        It blows my mind that some people think this course of action would be ok, and that it wouldn’t be abused by the authorities.

        • AbidanYre@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          God forbid we get guns off the streets or out of the hands of criminals.

          I’d be much happier if they were doing it for guns instead of marijuana like they have for the last several decades.

          What makes you think it would be abused any more than warrants are right now?

          • CarbonatedPastaSauce@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            What makes you think it would be abused any more than warrants are right now?

            Because time after time we’ve seen that when given new powers, new tools, or new technologies, the police abuse them.

            They would absolutely use this power to terrorize their opponents by ransacking their homes, whether they owned a gun or not. I’m not sure that it matters because more than half of this country seems to be ok with living in a fascist dictatorship as long as the dictator happens to be on their ‘side’ for the moment.

  • dmention7@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    It’s honestly kinda wild how many comments here are in favor of cops kicking down doors to enforce this law.

    I know, I know, Lemmy isn’t a singular person. But it’s rare to see the anti-gun crowd advocating for aggressive police action–apparently it’s okay just because they are gun owners?

    I absolutely believe we’d be better off with less guns floating around this country, but that necessarily is going to be a slow generational shift unless you’re advocating for violent standoffs between well-armed citizens and an even more well-armed state.

    • misanthropy@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      What the anti gun crowd doesn’t get is, saying you have a mental health issue blocks you from getting em, so people are going to bottle shit up because one moment of weakness might cost you your right for a lifetime. It actively discourages people from getting help.

      • Ozone6363@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        It’s almost as if they don’t have a fucking solution at all.

        Despite pointing to “evErY oThER cOUnTrY doEsNt hAvE a PrObleM” they haven’t thought about gun control implementation for 3 seconds.

        It’s literally as bad as the conservative saying “do nothing” or “more guns solve the problem”. It’s equally as stupid as that, but the liberal crowd acts like they’re fuckin geniuses whilst giving their suggestions.

  • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    If someone is too dangerous to own a gun then they’re too dangerous to be loose in society anyway. They can always find some other means to hurt people.

      • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        No, they should be locked up somewhere until they receive sufficient treatment to straighten them out.

            • CarbonatedPastaSauce@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              6 months ago

              Don’t know, I’m not an expert on that. But locking them in a dark room somewhere out of sight isn’t the answer. The whole “until they receive sufficient treatment” is the missing piece in the puzzle, because that doesn’t happen. That’s the part I’d like to see get fixed instead of spending money on torturing them.

  • ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    Start putting these people in jail in large numbers. Make it clear to the rest that they need to surrender their illegal firearms.

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        The judge sees through the lie and issues a search warrant anyway?

        • bluGill@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          There are lots of ways to hide guns. One person who is a legal gun owner who doesn’t approve of the law can hide them for his friends. Do not assume Illinois is united on this, enough voters are to pass a law, but gun owners consider this a tyranny of the majority and are sticking together

          In a lot of rural areas where guns are most common the police don’t approve of the law. They won’t ask for a warrant in the first place. If someone else asks for one they will give plenty of warning to the person to be searched - or they will just take the warrant and throw it away without searching. If forced to search they will ignore you moving guns past the front door when they knock, then when the door opens find no guns in plane sight in the front room and leave.

      • snooggums@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        “Cool, then you shouldn’t mind if we search your entire property right now to prove that you don’t still have the thing you are explicitly prohibited from possessing. Or you can show us where you were boating when they were lost and we can charge you for the cost of the search if they aren’t there.”