• lolola@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    I appreciate this thread’s nuanced discussion of how file deletion works from a technical standpoint depending on storage medium. But as a user, when I delete something, it should go away forever. I don’t care how.

    • LucidNightmare@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      It’s to prevent you from accidentally deleting a photo you would never want to delete. If you want to make sure it’s deleted, you just go into the Photos app and delete it from the Recently Deleted folder. I prefer this approach, as I have accidentally deleted a photo that I did not mean to, and luckily it was still there. Use cases are different though, so.

    • wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      I don’t care how

      grabs your phone, throws it on the ground and blasts it with a shotgun

      There you go! =)

  • mojo_raisin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    Nothing sinister, we just don’t delete what we say we delete. Instead we keep it in your profile to feed the algorithms and set the “deleted” flag to make you think it’s gone.

    • Simon Müller@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      I mean, to be completely fair, that’s how data storage works.

      We cannot really just make data disappear, so we let it get overwritten instead

      • mojo_raisin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        But clearly the data is not overwritten and this was intentional. How do I know? Because that would amount to a massive amount of data, if it was de to a bug in Apple software or underlying filesystems, it would be detected in monitoring systems “Hey, we’re using 10x the data we should be, maybe we should look into it”.

        The mistake was in the flag code that was supposed to fool us.

        • Simon Müller@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          no when I say “overwritten” I mean that the area is set as deleted in the filesystem and the next time something writes to that area the data that was there before is disregarded.

    • Classy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Not true, it specifically states in the article that, for example, one user had over 300 photos reappear, “some of which were revealing”. This is obviously not great but it isn’t likely as scandalous as it’s being made out to be.

        • azalty@jlai.lu
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          It was kinda wrote like a statement. People who didn’t read the article will read it as such, misinforming people

          • Glytch@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            Since we’re being pedantic: the word you’re looking for is “written” not “wrote”.

            • Classy@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              6 months ago

              There’s so much misinformation online, sure it could have been a joke but it’s so easy to just be lazy, read the comment straight and move on acting like there’s some kind of operation going on at Apple stealing your nudes. I don’t really care if it’s a joke or not, and you’re not even the OP so who are you to say it’s for a fact a joke?

              • azalty@jlai.lu
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                6 months ago

                That was the case for me, until I decided to read the article

                • Darkenfolk@dormi.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  What article, it’s just a link. If I can’t read it here it ain’t there.

                  We shouldn’t encourage post-bot behaviour in the posters, title+summary or gtfo.

  • Mokujin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    If you never had any nudes in the first place, and update, is there a chance to get some?

    Asking for a friend.

      • pete_the_cat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        The only problem with that server is there are tons of shit you’d rather not see. It’s sadly not as easy to filter like the reddit porn subs are.

        • Plopp@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          Is it that bad? I’ve been making a habit of blocking every community that shows up that I don’t want to see. So these days I rarely see stuff I really don’t want to see.

  • ColdWater@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    I still don’t get why people take pictures of themselves being nude and complained when it got leak because data breach

  • cum@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    Dang must suck being on a proprietary locked down platform you have no control over. That’s literally impossible on my deGoogled android running GOS.