I’m interested to see what lemmy thinks of this, I honestly haven’t kept track of the potential options.

    • souless@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      America designed the justice system to hurt felons after time served. Let’s enforce the hand of justice and make it a rule a convict can’t hold the highest government position. Seems only fair treatment to me.

  • TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Mark Kelly.

    Astronaut, has absolutely been an amazing husband to Gabby Gifords, impeccable background that is literally the American Dream, and untouchable character.

    He would absolutely destroy Trump.

    • warbond@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      And he has a twin with a nearly identical pedigree, it’s insane. But I’d love to see a Harris/Kelly ticket.

    • rezz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      I’ve never heard of him until just now—one glance and he is elite. This is easily the best candidate they could field.

      • neidu2@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Any order is fine by me, but part of me wants some retired cop to see that the guy he dragged away from civil rights protests in the 70s is now president.

        • Blackmist@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          Let’s be brutally honest here, those cops will have long since died of alcoholism.

      • ℕ𝕖𝕞𝕠@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        I think she’s awesome in general. I think her service record and voting record make her a palatable or even desirable candidate for a wide swath of the population, not just Democrats — I’m not one myself, though I vote for more Democrats than any other party’s candidates.

        • Maeve@kbin.earth
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Thank you for replying. I considered her for my primary vote, when she ran, but ultimately wrote in my candidate.

  • HelixDab2@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    I don’t think that there are any that I would back 100%. There are a lot that I could support 90% or more, like Sanders and Warren. Even AOC.

    OTOH, I also strongly believe in 2A rights–in addition to freedom of/from religion, freedom of speech, freedom of choice, etc.–and there simply are not any Democratic candidates that I’m aware of that support 2A rights. They always say, “I support 2A rights, but…”, and that “but” immediately precedes ideas to restrict 2A rights in significant ways. (“I support 2A rights, but I just don’t think that anyone needs a gun other than a muzzle loading Kentucky long rifle.”)

    In short, I’ll never support any Republican more than, at most, 40%. I have yet to find any Democrat that I can support more than 90%.

    • Andy@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I like Porter. AOC needs a rest, I think.

      I used to be really captivated by her leadership, but in the last few years, I think things have gotten complicated. Perhaps I’m being too forgiving, but during Biden’s presidency it seemed like she lost her nerve to stick her neck out for what she believed in more and more. Maybe I’m inventing things, but I get the sense that January 6th scared the fucking shit out of her. I think her life flashed before her eyes, and afterwards she felt like being among the most progressive voices while trying not to rock the boat too much or draw too much personal attention from the right was enough, and that challenging Democrats on their bullshit was too stressful and risky.

      If that’s the case, I don’t blame her. I still admire what she’s done, but she does not have the spark she once did.

  • FireTower@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    I think Cory Booker has potential. But a ham sandwich is the most electable candidate today. Just be somewhat alive and not problematic.

  • toomanypancakes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Maria Branyas.

    I think age is important, and Biden just didn’t have the necessary life experience to be a successful candidate 😉

  • jimmydoreisalefty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    The duopoly choice is Bernie Sanders, even though he betrayed his movement and the people that helped fund and grow his grassroots campaign.

    A non-duopoly choice is a 3rd Party candidate, Jill Stien, Green Party.

    • jj4211@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      A non-duopoly choice is a 3rd Party candidate, Jill Stien, Green Party.

      Reading her platform, I’d say it’s a no go for me.

      Two bullet points back to back are “Have the UN Security Council hold Israel accountable” and at the same time “end the UN Security Council”. So which is it, use the UNSC to hold Israel accountable or the UNSC is a bad thing?

      Also on her platform, disband NATO and stop giving Ukraine aid. If we do this, then Ukraine and Russia will just hug it out and everyone will be happy. A few unrealistic things like this where it’s way too optimistic and paves the way for things to go horribly wrong.

      Then there are the good intentions, but bad consequences ideas. Pay reparations to third world countries for climate. Historically, “just dump money and resources” has been tried and you just give those to regional warlords that will make things worse. Need a more thought out engagement plan than that.

      Broadly some decent domestic policy goals, but pretty impractical foreign policy ideas.

    • intensely_human@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      I’d vote for Bernie Sanders because he has a podcast. Any politician that seeks out long conversations is a winner in my book.

      • Andy@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        While I don’t traffic in such forceful language, I can answer what @criitz means:

        Bernie Sanders raised millions of dollars on the promise to lead a political revolution. For many supporters, that proposition was taken literally. They thought that his campaign was not simply a vehicle to give him the power of the presidency, but was the organizing structure for a persistent movement of activists reengaging with democracy each and every week BETWEEN elections. And when he dropped out, a lot of those people lost their connections to social and organizing structures that were giving them hope and an outlet for meeting like-minded people to find ways to make their communities better. So when he ended his campaign and all that money and infrastructure got instantly packed up and taken away, they felt like they’d been misled.

        Some found their way into activism through the DSA or climate groups, but for many, the way in which he disbanded his campaign without following through on the implied promise to transform it into something durable was a very unexpected and painful surprise.

      • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        I think Bernie’s earned it though. He may be old, but he’s still mentally intact. Trump was never mentally intact, and Biden…well…yeah. Biden kinda fell off his rocker. Good man. I wish him all the best, and hope he gets the care he needs. However, we don’t really need someone who talks about how we defeated health care running our health care.

        I may hate Trump, but he did have one line that I think sealed the deal for Biden. He said “I don’t know what he said, I don’t think he knows what he said”, and everybody just kind of saddly nodded their head, because it was true.

        But Bernie will be a firecracker up your ass fighting the good fight for every American. And unlike a lot of these politicians, he’s not a phoney. Harris can say that she’s changed, and she now stands to legalize marijuanna, and all this other stuff…but she has a track record. Bernie has a track record too, except he HASN’T changed. There’s photos of him in the 60s getting arrested fighting for civil rights. I’d rather he be president than a younger person who may or may not be who they say they are. Plus I like his policies.

  • Ledivin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    I like Buttigieg the most, but I don’t think he has enough time to be built up for this election. I’d be excited to see him as a VP ticket, or for next election.

    I think that Kamala is our best choice, but I worry that our country isn’t ready to vote in a female president. We’re still so ridiculously misogynistic that it would be comical if it wasn’t such a fucking travesty

    • Jolteon@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I would disagree. The only reason the last woman to run for president failed was because she was Hillary Clinton. If she’d have been virtually anyone else, she’d probably have won.

    • Andy@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Pete needs to go mayor some more. He had a few good ideas during the primary, but as Transportation Secretary I’m astounded at his lack of ambition.

      There are a handful of administration officials – Lina Khan first among them – who’ve learned to use their power assertively to make changes to broken systems. And Pete… he seems like he just pops up when another piece of infrastructure breaks to let us know that he’s on it. Maybe he’s doing something more, but if so he’s doing it very, very quietly.

      • batmaniam@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        This was sort of my impression to. Like I loosely liked him, but couldn’t really tell you what he’s directly responsible for. Which isn’t a bad thing on its own and doesn’t mean he wasnt doing a good job, just that I don’t know much about him.

      • sunzu@kbin.run
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Bro… Lina got put in place to show that feds are “trying”

        The judiciary is clearly not impressed.

        Wall Street Pete is there to cover up railroad accidents and Boeing bullshit. I don’t think he even has good intentions, just management consulting zombie being put in place to do corruption for the elites.