“Today I want to offer my full support and endorsement for Kamala to be the nominee of our party this year. Democrats — it’s time to come together and beat Trump. Let’s do this,” he added.

  • neidu2@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    I’m sure she’d do just fine as president, but I have a hard time believing that the US is going to elect a woman of color.

    Please, voters, I hope I’m wrong on this one. Prove me wrong, please.

    • Nougat@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Couple of positives:

      Having the current VP take over the nomination at this point is “continuity of leadership.” It’s a much smaller change than bringing in someone with less name recognition, or from a “lower” political position.

      Having a woman of color take the nomination would make the race between Harris and Trump much ideologically clearer. It would also dare the right to show its true colors about it. Remember that we got Trump essentially as a “Well, if you can elect a black guy, we can elect a racist lunatic!” Having a woman of color running as the Democratic nominee is going to make people pick sides even harder than they are already, and it’s the “oh god, not Trump” people who really need to be motivated to pick their side.

      And you know that Biden’s endorsement of Harris had to have come after discussions with congressional Democrats and other party leaders to make sure most everyone gets in line behind Harris, and doesn’t act like a bunch of backyard chickens going every direction. I expect (hope?) this endorsement to be followed by many others.

  • Silverseren@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    One funny thing to note is that, outside of just overt racism, all the arguments to use against Harris (that were used in the last election and primarily from the left) are ones that…won’t exactly make her seem bad to conservatives. Like, are you really going to use a “she’s tough on crime” argument against her?

    • ericjmorey@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Republican voters are never going to change their preference to a democratic candidate based on who the Democratic candidate is. The people who have potential to vote for Democrats aren’t undecided in who they prefer, they’re undecided if they even care enough to vote at all. Getting more people motivated to vote who didn’t vote in the prior election is the only way to gain votes. That’s true for any Democratic or Republican candidate for president. Presidential candidates need to make sure that people who voted in the last election for their party’s candidate don’t become disinterested in voting in the current election.

      The tough on crime reputation Harris has may demotivate otherwise likely voters for a Democratic candidate.