• federal reverse@feddit.org
    shield
    M
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    I got a report that this article is paywalled but am not seeing a paywall here. Is anyone having issues?

  • Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    I mean, my local server is the backup plan.

    I can game for days without food or water and only need to emerge to forage like once a week.

    Perhaps even visit the local market for fresh memes, but thats it.

  • fubarx@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    30 days ago

    The moment every hoarder with a home PLEX-server and an overflowing NAS has been waiting for.

  • Melchior@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    The EU could also supply Ukraine with weapons, which could destroy Russias entire electricity grid, oil refining capacity, gas network and key pieces of its transport infrastructure. However there is no need to be loud about it, since everybody knows that is true.

  • YourPrivatHater@ani.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    It cant. Russia can’t. And there is no such thing as “The internet” there are many many different parts of it. This is just another version of “wE hAVe NuKes”

    • frezik@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      They can knock out huge sections. Most of the Middle East was taken offline some years ago with only one cable cut. The old redundant Internet of the Cold War is long gone even within the US. Most of the rest of the world never had redundancy to begin with.

    • xor@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      they’re quite capable of taking out the satellite portion….
      see also: Starfish Prime

      … weird how you just replied to the title of the article without reading it…

      then we have no constraints - even moral - left to prevent us from destroying the ocean floor cable communications of our enemies,

      they’re talking about cutting ocean floor cables…

      and

      In recent months, Russia has been accused of interfering with GPS navigation systems, causing havoc on commercial airline routes. As a result, flights from Helsinki to Tartu, Estonia, ground to a halt for a month in April.

      nothing about nukes.

      • YourPrivatHater@ani.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Technically they could down satellites, but thats nither the entire internet nor is it a good idea for themselves. Doing that would make it increasingly harder to operate any satellite in orbit due to the prices left behind, they don’t just fall down, its a gigantic shotgun cloud aiming for other satellites.

        Also Russia is kinda using GPS themselves lol.

        Furthermore there is the European Union or rather Esa made Galileo https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galileo_(satellite_navigation) GNSS is a backup for GPS (and even more accurate lol).

        They do technically have nukes as well. Doesn’t mean using them is anywhere near reasonable or beneficial…

        And i said its like “we have nukes” its a empty threat not literally we have nukes, you could use nukes to destroy the internet as a total. But that would cost everyone’s life.

        • xor@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          undersea cables… the threat was about cutting undersea cables….
          stfu, nobody said the entire internet….

          just read the article before trying to debunk the title….

          • YourPrivatHater@ani.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            Undersea Kabels wouldn’t really matter, it would impact the transfer rate/ping between usa and EU but it wouldn’t kill the internet.

            Also most of these cables are very deep in the ocean and relatively small and very hard to find and where they are not deep (at the ends) there is heavy monitoring. Furthermore the locations of these cables are not publicly available. Finding them without the location data is like trying to find a specific grain of sand on a beach, its possible, but not very likely at best.

            Btw, no reason to be so mad lol

            • Ibuthyr@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 month ago

              Given Russia’s massive hard-on for spy activities, there is a near 100% chance they have mapped it out completely.

              It still doesn’t matter, as the internet is Russia’s best weapon by far. They’re not going to change that anytime soon.

    • SuspiciousCatThing@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      Ah jeez that’d be terrible. I’d probably have to stay home because nothing in society would be working. Then to pass the time I’d have to do things like reading the books I’ve been dying for time to read or finally getting to my collection of handheld consoles and emulators.

      Might even have to have a glass of wine to calm my nerves from the stress.

  • frazw@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    Russian warfare is 90% cyber these days. They troll, hack, spy and attempt to influence elections using the internet. Are they really going to cut off their ability to engage in those activities? It’s like saying they will blow up their own weapons factories if people don’t start catching their bullets.

    • Quittenbrot@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      They did waste vast amounts of own men and material when deciding to enter Ukraine to take a quick “short stroll” that somehow now already takes over 900 days. Wouldn’t be the first time they shoot themselves in the foot proper.

  • poVoq@slrpnk.netM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Well, let them try. It’s unlikely to result in anything more than a temporary disruption and as a result a lot of current shitty practises would need to be improved so I see that as a net positive.

  • Kissaki@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    What degree of aggression against the EU would spur the EU into action?

    Russia already can’t take over Ukraine. It would not be able to fight on more fronts, and certainly not against a strong EU with many more resources to spare.

    Cyberwarfare and individual assassinations, sabotage, and disinformation campaigns were not enough yet. The EU is patient, because there’s nothing to win. But the invasion of Ukraine showed that the EU can suddenly and significantly oppose Russia when certain lines are crossed.

    Surely, it’s in the interest of Russia both as preparation, but in large part to try to unsettle the EU, mainly its citizens. Much like it tried with Nuke warnings. GPS disruptions across borders. Gas and oil cutoffs. Blocking Ukraine food exports. Etc etc.