• this@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    The meme is literally correct. when you make an audio file into an mp3, it takes some of the sonic information that our brains are bad at noticing and just…completely removes it(to save storage space). if it’s a high quallity mp3 its essentially completely unnoticable. That’s why it’s psychoacoustic, it uses psychology to fool your brain into thinking it sounds better than it does, litterally.

    Psycoachoustic is basically just a big word for taking into account how our brains deal with what we hear.

    Also I’m not saying mp3 is bad, in fact I think the opposite is true. I think it’s good to think of it like being the .JPG of audio, you’re not getting the original quallity and that’s the point and unless you need to do manipulate that audio file and its a reasonable quallity then you likely won’t notice the difference.

    Ogg vorbis (.ogg) is a better codec though IMO.

    *edited for spelling and grammers

  • Yardy Sardley@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Not just mp3, all lossy audio formats use psychoacoustic analysis. That’s how they figure out which data to throw out.

  • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    I think people generally have been taught to accept lower quality for convenience and even I, the guy who cared a lot about quality and spent for it, have acquiesced. I want full quality, uncompressed everything. But I stream my movies and stopped buying Blu-rays. I still buy CDs, but I’m an old man who likes album art.