Hundreds of people are putting money on whether the company will back-track on its new API pricing policy or oust its CEO Steve Huffman, BetUS told Insider.
The online betting company said there was “very close heat” over whether Reddit will reverse its new pricing policy.
“So far, the betting public seems very much “at odds” and are undecided on this one so far,” it said.
Almost all bets have been on Huffman still being CEO by December 31, BetUS added.
Let’s just bet on a replacement for Reddit. It has run its course.
So… kbin?
Not gonna happen. They’ll stick by the API changes, maybe with some tweaks. The main structure will be the same, I’m sure.
To be honest, I’ve been dissatisfied with Reddit for quite a while now but just didn’t realise it. Once I dipped my toes into the Fediverse I realised what it was I’d been missing: that sense of community that Reddit used to have before it became too big, too cold and too corporate. In my defence I used RIF for years and was shielded from the worst excesses of corporate culture. After setting myself up on Lemmy and getting a bit of a handle on what’s what I’m really enjoying the sense of intimacy and DIY ethos. It’s far more like the Reddit I used to know. It feels good to be back.
Same. I’ve really been enjoying Kbin. More than I’ve enjoyed Reddit in years.
When Relay for Reddit goes down, that site is dead to me. If someone can make a Relay-quality app for Kbin it’s game fucking over haha.
The only thing I’m going to miss is /r/askhistorians. What a great subreddit.
I would wager that some of of the history folks there will most-likely show up here.
They looked at Lemmy/Kbin and said it didn’t meet their criteria.
Their goal is to reach as broad an audience as possible and the platform is too small right now. One of the reasons they can get professional historians to write thesis-length replies is that those historians know their responses might be seen by tens of thousands of people or more.
Markets can be used to predict things by extracting information from the crowds. Every individual person has an incentive to do the best analysis he can and use all the information he can to make a return. And so the rest of the world can look at the prices and get an idea of what the best assessments out there are.
The US intelligence community, some years back, started trying to establish a futures market on things like assassinations, because having a powerful predictive tool to know in advance when something happens could be useful. It was controversial – probably helped by the rather scary logo of the Information Awareness Office, the guys working on it – but one point raised that caused it to be shot down is that the establishment of a market where people are betting on an outcome can affect the outcome if the bettors can act to affect the outcome. Like, say I make purchases in the market that are betting really hard on the unlikely probability that some world leader is going to be shot in the next week. I might just run out and get myself a rifle and make myself a whole lot of money.
The decision was that that was a pretty serious misincentive, and so the idea of having a futures market on assassinations was dumped.
But, coming back to the current situation, if one believes that one can push the situation one way or another, it might be that an organization could place a considerable bet and then try to swing things.
Lmao that logo, they really can’t help themselves with the Illuminati allegations can they
If I’m not being punked right now, this is absolutely hilarious. I dare someone to write a better comedy.
