They would have very little reason to invade taiwan at that point. So they probably wouldn’t.
Not about actually needing a reason to invade, it’s about the implication
They would have very little reason to invade taiwan at that point. So they probably wouldn’t.
Not about actually needing a reason to invade, it’s about the implication
Just don’t be poor you fuckin’ loser
The number of math epiphanies I’ve had on youtube is way too high. Good math teachers are a rare breed.
You only think that because you’re not a criminal.
As much as I believe it is a breeding ground for right wing extremism, it’s a little strange that 4chan is being lumped in with these other sites for a suit like this. As far as I know, 4chan just promotes topics based on the number of people posting to it, and otherwise doesn’t employ an algorithm at all. Kind of a different beast to the others, who have active algorithms trying to drive engagement at any cost.
The reason waste isn’t being brought up is because modern designs do not produce nearly as much waste, and much safer waste, than previous technologies. Breeder reactors are able to produce more fissile material than they consume, and produce only waste products that have short half lives (less than 100 years). This is a long time from human perspectives, but it means that we do not have to design functionally indefinite storage for these materials any longer.
Shout out to oat milk. The best substitute milk in general, but the absolute star for substitutions in baking.
Did the article get edited or something? It’s saying that he won by 87% to me.
They do know this. They’re avoiding any legal exposure by being vague.
It says in the article they employed a commercial data set that is not composed of widely available public data in creating this app. Also, it lists a lot more information about people than whether or not they are christians.
So long as they save more on the planes than they spend on the lawsuits it’s a win according to investors.
It’s hilarious that you insist on the ethernet cable but not an actual computer.
That is perfectly fine, but any corrections or changes should be noted and explained, not quietly changed.
The red menace has always been a winner.
Why do you think that they give a shit about online privacy? This isn’t a privacy bill, it’s a bill stopping another government from doing exactly the same shit that the US government does through domestic apps. They aren’t looking out for people, they’re afraid of the competition.
This progress isn’t progressive enough!
Ghost Runner has many of the same aspects, and definitely scratches the same itch for me. It’s much more combat focused, but the combat actually feels like it was an intentional part of the game, at least.
If I’m remembering correctly, the game was originally designed to have no guns available to the player, but the team was pressured into adding the shooter mechanics later on. Ignoring guns is definitely the way to go with this game.
Feels like a fantastic base for an anti-trust case at the least.
Hey, me either, but telling someone “you don’t like it? Open your own laundromat or shut up” is some stupid shit.