• 0 Posts
  • 88 Comments
Joined 5 个月前
cake
Cake day: 2025年2月11日

help-circle






  • We start with society where this is no state. Where private property does not exist. The wage system has been abolished. In this society we already eliminate factors that cause people to commit crimes. In this society you are not a slave to earning money to pay for private or personal property. Today if you do not earn money for private or personal property then you are homeless. Without aid you will die.

    Justice in this society does not have the same character. Today it is two-party and it seems that the two-party model of disputes is a single unit of people, and a unit of the thinnest sort, whose only imply is “has property,” “is an aggressor,” “defends themself,” “kills so and so". This is a severely individualistic view of people that is not characteristic of an anarchist society of commune and mutual aid.

    Any justice system is going to exist in the context of economic institutions. If there are inequality of power in the economic and society then you have to imagine society as bizzare and weirdly compartmentalized in order to believe that those inequalities will not to reflect themselves in justice or law. And the economically powerful will be unable to manipulate the legal and judicial system to their advantage. But this is the character of today’s two party so-called justice system.

    Today, justice is not just.











  • It has the sound that your belief is that a justice system must be courts and appointed judges. That justice must be the same as the current United States and United Kingdom justice.

    I don’t think I will to have a good discussion with you on alternative ways of collective agreements with a strongly held belief like that. I may be wrong but what you have said on this topic so far has the sound of that (sigh a society without hierarchy is impossible).