That’s ok, so is the population distribution.
That’s ok, so is the population distribution.
Taking lessons would require showing humility and admitting he isn’t already naturally the best at something.
The dossier is probably just one of those binders full of upholstery samples.
More to the point, why set up cameras for the overflow crowd? They need screens showing footage from inside, not cameras filming them.
Also, he probably wants a giant gold statue of himself, paid for by taxpayers.
Sounds like the term I’ve heard a lot: “Champagne socialist”.
Maybe we misheard and he said “this lets me sell more shoes”
Fingerprint search found him on crime database?
Gone from mine too, tried every sorting option. The link in the other comment works though. Probably some federation thing.
I agree, but the Democratic campaign will now be muted, or Republicans will rebuke them for any attacks and the media will enable them to make Democrats look bad for it.
Not saying it is staged, but this is a gift for Trump. Now no one can attack Trump in speeches or ads for the next 3 months without looking like an arsehole.
I have to wonder how they persuaded homophobic men to sign up to such a study.
Velcro sewn to just inside the top of your pocket, so sticking a hand in your pocket makes a loud noise and you can feel it, for any pickpocket to separate the velcro.
Isn’t that more of the same crime the trial was about?
David Hume could out-consume Wilhelm Freidrich Hegel
What kind of children’s pastor brags about “staring down” her charges, or calls them tyrants?
One of my favourite philosophers. He visited my Uni and had a great anecdote about a quote from his book: “maybe we are all zombies (it would be the height of intellectual dishonesty to quote this out of context)”, where he visited another Uni, and all the students had organised to wear t-shirts emblazoned with “Maybe we are all zombies - Daniel Dennett”.
In the 1960s, George Romney, Mitt’s father, regularly turned down his bonuses from his auto executive job, perhaps in part because his marginal tax rate would have been about 90 percent
If this is true he’s a fucking idiot. 10% of $x is better than $0. More likely the reason was that the bonuses pushed him over some threshold so he lost some other benefit, making it a net loss, or he negotiated some alternative compensation mechanism that had reduced or deferrable tax liability.
You don’t need any appraisal. You only need to know the purchase price and the selling price. The difference between them is the gain or loss.
“Every Little Helps”