Not everyone feels the need to read such articles. I’m glad for this summary. Provided it’s true, but it’s entirely believable.
Not everyone feels the need to read such articles. I’m glad for this summary. Provided it’s true, but it’s entirely believable.
Frankly? Yes, a bit. I wouldn’t have expected Tesla to make it that high and I would expect Google somewhere near the top. And I guess it focused only on american companies, or I would be much more surprised.
Why are there such high differences around Britain and pretty much nowhere else? I understand why the Mediterranean sea has almost none, such a large volume just can’t pass the Gibraltar, but I don’t understand why there is so much water moving around Britain. Is it just water moving along and being stopped by land wihnout having much other places to flow?
That makes sense. Thanks!
What does the “/s/” mean? Probably not that the “Respectfully” is sarcasm, right?
I didn’t check the calculation, but I guess it assumes perfect conversion of motion to heat. But it’s good to know that if you can get a perfectly static chicken, you can hypersonic-slap it cooked.
The time when you get power armor. I usually rush mk2 and skip mk1, but still, around that time. At that time, you definitely don’t have a spidertron. Spidertron is definitely late game. Of course, at that time, spidertron is the weapon of choice.
I know. And I’m sure there will be more weapons. I’m just a little worried about what is currently late midgame situation on Nauvis, especially during expnsion. Just when you get your your power armor and finally can clean up nests with relative ease. I’m not especially fond of combat, especially in person, so I really like finally being quite safe. I guess I’ll have to change tactics and use combat robots much more.
Even in legendary quality, it does 25 damage compared to 30 now. I’m sure you can still be a formidable killing machine, but quite late, and not on Nauvis alone. I’m going to miss being safe and unstoppable. But I trust the devs to make a fun game, they were incredibly successful in this so far.
You mean like official EU data? https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/demo_r_d3dens/default/map?lang=en And “go see in person” is a very bad advice to anything data-related in most cases. Compating population density anywhere in Europe with Netherlands isn’t fair. Poland, Hungary and Romania (and north Balkan as well, it seems) have denser population than rural France, for example. Spain is less densely populated, but still has about as many tennis courts, so it must have much more per capita. It just isn’t a population density map. It is another Iron curtain division map, but even so, Czechia and Slovakia stand out as exceptions. There is interesting information in there.
Are we looking at the same pictures? Spain is less dense, but Poland seems mostly denser than rural France and Balkan roughly the same.
Is it, though? Is Spain, Poland and Balkan so much less populated than Germany or France?
Cool. At a glance, oldest are horse riders and sometimes shooters, youngest skateboarders and some swimmers.
Yes. Behind the toilet.
Do they actually work? I don’t have actual experience, but I heard that they are only used by people who might benefit from them and thus the authors are automatically suspicious to the reviewer, plus you almost always cite your previous papers in a pretty obvious way, so it’s hardly blind anyway.
I relatively often meet 4 of these:
no speed limit (use the normal limit for this type of road)
car tires may defy laws of nature (slippery road, usually followed by a sign saying it applies during rain)
speed camera ahead
no water polluting goods (not very common, but occasionally comes up. There is also no dangerous materials with an orange trapezoid instead of an ellipse)
I also saw don’t drive off the pier (around ferries), watch for skiers (in the mountains with cross-country skiing routes), and warning about planes, although in different design (around airports).
Cool, thanks for the info!
How does Plantnet fare in tropics?
I thought these were disproved by lack of gravitational microlensing?