EDIT: Let’s cool it with the downvotes, dudes. We’re not out to cut funding to your black hole detection chamber or revoke the degrees of chiropractors just because a couple of us don’t believe in it, okay? Chill out, participate with the prompt and continue with having a nice day. I’m sure almost everybody has something to add.

  • ani
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    6 months ago

    Psychiatry and psychiatric drugs. But it is hardly scientific anyway

    • them@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      The problem with psychiatry is that it’s expected to have quick fixes like other schools of medicine. Often the conditions are chronic and the treatment is long term at best which makes it slow and expensive. Drugs can help in the short term but they’re often not able to be replaced by correct treatment due to funding.

      • ani
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        That sounds about right. Could you give an example of what correct treatment should be? I agree that treatment for many conditions is long term.

        • them@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          I’m not an expert by any means but just happen to have some knowledge on the subject.

          It really depends on the condition, how severe it is and if there are any compounding issues. Take something like depression as an example. In my country, UK, you’ll often end up on antidepressants, and get a referral to a specialist if you’re lucky. The specialist likely won’t have the funding or at least a huge backlog of patients to work through so they’ll be trying to get you out on your own as soon a possible, which means getting you to ‘good enough’. As a result you’ll likely remain on antidepressants when continued therapy would be much more beneficial and could take you off the medication. Drugs are cheap but time with a therapist is not.

    • spittingimage@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      6 months ago

      It’s a statistical science. While other branches can be all like “splitting atoms will definitely give you an energetic reaction” psychology is like "this helps in 60% of cases so we’re gonna try it on you ".

      • model_tar_gz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        6 months ago

        To be fair here, technically throwing neutrons at matter has only some probability of causing it to fission, and statistics tells us how many do. It’s just that there are so many more neutrons and nuclei than there are people, so we can say with statistical confidence that under such and such conditions, y will occur when x happens.

        Not that different. Just more samples and observations.