EDIT: Let’s cool it with the downvotes, dudes. We’re not out to cut funding to your black hole detection chamber or revoke the degrees of chiropractors just because a couple of us don’t believe in it, okay? Chill out, participate with the prompt and continue with having a nice day. I’m sure almost everybody has something to add.

  • ani
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    Chill science should be questioned otherwise it’s not science

    • force@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Science should be questioned by people who understand the science, not by random people who don’t understand the research. Which a lot of people who know nothing about the science or the maths/data or whatever try to question it

      • AMDIsOurLord@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Right, all the people talking shit about dark matter in this thread surely all have 4 PhDs up their ass

        No investigation, no right to speak

      • YeetPics@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        This is a really stupid take, how do you think new scientists are made if not reaching for enlightenment to answer their own questions?

        Science is about being wrong and learning.

        • force@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Yes, and people that challenge the science who then become scientists actually research/experiment thenselves. They don’t go and claim science is false until they have actual reason/evidence to believe so. One can question science all they want when they do their own science on the matter and it isn’t handily disproved beyond reasonable doubt by existing evidence.

          Most science deniers do not do that. Making anti-science claims without obtaining solid, consistent evidence is not science.

      • ani
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        People are free to express what they think about science. There’s no law saying otherwise. Why are you guys so upset?

        • force@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          “There’s no law against it” is a laughably stupid reason to do something. They’re free to do it but everyone else is free to acknowledge that their uneducated/misinformed skepticism is harmful to society and that their opinions are meaningless to those who aren’t dumb. Leave the contemporary science denial to those who actually somewhat know what they’re talking about.

          • ani
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            This is a question on AskLemmy. It won’t change anything in the world. Why do you care? You guys should touch grass

              • ani
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                Let’s touch grass together to measure how much photosynthesis grass can do? Please, it will be fun. But I’m open to another scientific experiment if you have anything in mind

      • ani
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        Sorry I’m an heretic I guess so I must die burning (please no)