• Grayox@lemmy.mlOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    32
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yeah that’s called late stage Communism, which we have never achieved as humanity. Late stage Capitalism is currently pushing more and more folks into dangerous housing situations like the bottom right quadrant of this meme. Capitalism and Utopia are oxymorons while Communism and Utopia are synonymous.

      • Grayox@lemmy.mlOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        20
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Call me old fashion but no one living on the streets and having their basic needs met sounds pretty utopian to me.

        • GrapesOfAss@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Ah yes because there was no one living on the streets, yes because a propaganda told me that it must be true.

          I guess killing literal millions of your own citizens is better than being homeless, huh?

        • xerazal@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          There were still people that lived in the streets in the USSR. Also, the housing the USSR provided wasn’t really that… great… I watch a Russian YouTuber (NFKRZ) who has talked about Soviet architecture in not just Russia, but other former USSR countries and shows that yes it’s good they were built, they weren’t very well built.

          The USSR had many problems, and bureaucracy was a big problem. I never understood why tankies love the USSR so much when the USSR didn’t truly get rid of class. Those in the government lived like kings compared to the common man, who yes lived better than they had before but still not that well due to the bloated and mismanagement of the government.

          Idk, the fact that they even had a centralized government like that seems like… the opposite of communism to me.

          • cecinestpasunbot@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I think what people don’t fully understand is that Marxism is meant to be scientific. That means that there will likely be many imperfect and failed attempts at building a socialist society before one comes along that is stable enough to outlast outside interference from capitalist states.

            As such, most people I know who like the USSR are also it’s biggest critiques. Unfortunately, there is so much misinformation about the USSR that most discussions about it online are just about delineating truth from propaganda.

    • probablyaCat@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah those soviets sure got rid of the homeless problem. Can’t be homeless when you were intentionally starved to death.