• Album@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    8 months ago

    Effectively the end goal is to make adblocking in chrome hard/complex enough that the masses don’t use it. What Google doesn’t want is what is effectively a one click solution to adblocking. Anything else is unrealistic and unobtainable and they know it.

    So by forcing users to use a version that can’t be updated daily/hourly you’re already making it so you can’t block YouTube ads which as of recent require regular list updates.

    Or by forcing users to have two extensions or an extension and an external process to download lists you’re adding a step that most users won’t bother trying to do.

    If Google can cut adblocking to 30% of the current user base then that’s a huge win for them.

    What I’m trying to say is that it’s not entirely correct that Google is trying to “end adblocking” but rather their effort is to reduce it significantly within the products they control.

    Honestly I don’t blame them but I don’t think we can be blamed for switching browsers either.

    • Sotuanduso@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      If that’s the goal, I don’t really mind. Adblocking always used to be a thing that most people don’t bother with, so companies didn’t mind all that much when a few of us did. If we’re just going back to that point, and we adblock enthusiasts don’t have to jump through ridiculous hoops to keep doing what we’re doing, I see that as a win-win.