Right now there’s an incentive to juuust hit a majority in order to maximize a party’s own appointments, so political systems with high fragmentation have government stability problems. Would there be a way to work around this? Could a parliament maybe do some of the work of a government directly, for example?

  • qnick@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    If the coalition is larger than a majority, it turns into the one-party system, like China, North Korea or Russia. They don’t have government stability problems.

    • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Hmm, I guess that is a concern, isn’t it?

      Maybe one more party than necessary should be the target. No brinksmanship causing perpetual crises, but if there’s an actual issue multiple parties can break off. Party list is so beautiful and simple otherwise…

      • qnick@lemmy.worldM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s a classic concentration of power vs disperse of power problem. If you need efficiency and quick solutions, go with a “strong leader” or “strong party”. If you need freedom, try to avoid one-party systems

        • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.orgOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          You know, I don’t believe it is an either-or situation, at least completely. Autocracies are often inefficient, and it seems like it should be possible for parties to share power a single way until the next scheduled election.