• beefcat@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      The entire design philosophy of GNOME drives me up a wall. Who in their right mind decided we don’t need minimize buttons on our windows?

      • Fal@yiffit.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s just awful. It’s even worse than macs, which is honestly an impressive accomplishment.

      • mvirts@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        It’s definitely a departure from tradition, but there are whole swaths of people who have never regularly used a desktop interface who will probably feel at home. I can use gnome 3 for long periods of time but will inevitably switch to xfce or KDE for serious multitasking

    • Yote.zip@pawb.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I actually really like GNOME on a laptop but I can’t stand it on a desktop. I think it just has specific usecases in mind.

      • 稲荷大神の狐@yiffit.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I honestly love Gnome. But then again it also is very distraction free which is good for my ADHD. It helps keep me focused on both my desktop and Thinkpad T480 when I use either one.(─‿‿─)

        KDE is good too, but when I used it, I spent more time tinkering than getting anything accomplished. (¬_¬)

        • SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          From what I know, Gnome tends to be more of the “our way or the highway” type, similar to Apple stuff.

          If you like how they do things, it’s fine. But if you don’t, you need to use something else, like KDE plasma (which is very customizable).

        • Yote.zip@pawb.socialOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          GNOME has a very different workflow from most traditional desktop environments. It takes some getting used to, and it’s debatable whether it’s even a good workflow on a desktop. It’s a lot more keyboard-driven and single-window/activity focused, which I find works really well on a laptop but annoys me to no end on a desktop. Here’s a couple videos on GNOME 3’s workflow: One, Two

          There’s also some political reasons people dislike GNOME - GNOME version 3 was the advent of this new workflow and it replaced/killed GNOME 2 which people really really really liked. On launch GNOME 3 was very buggy, slow, and bloated, and even though it’s gotten better people have trouble shaking this first impression. Even now there’s valid criticisms of GNOME 3, such as its over-simplification and need to hide/remove useful things from the users, and its over-reliance on community-maintained extensions (which frequently break on GNOME version updates) to try to bring critical functionality back into the users’ hands. Its “rival”, KDE, has roughly the opposite approach - giving the users as many options as can fit on a settings page and giving them options for how they want their workflow to function.

          If you want the original GNOME 2 experience, there’s MATE. If you want GNOME 3 but in a traditional workflow style, there’s Cinnamon.