It’s basically child porn and I’m pretty sure we and the admins don’t want to propogate that.

  • AnimusAstralis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m not searching for CP, so I don’t care, yet a quarter of all posts being about banning some community is worrying

    • computerquip@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I agree actually. Everything is already super fragmented ultimately defeating the purpose of federation. Defederating doesn’t remove that content either, it just makes it harder to access.

      • meat_popsicle@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        it just makes it harder to access.

        Not only. For CP and other possible legally risky content, Federation means violating data may be shared between instances.

        Also, this is stated like it’s a negative? Are you saying this because it should be easy to access child porn?

        WTF?

        • computerquip@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          That’s a strawman argument and an argument from emotion. If they’re really hosting CP, then bring down the law on them. They usually can’t because they likely aren’t hosting CP, they’re hosting content that makes you uncomfortable. I’m not for banning stuff that makes you uncomfortable, regardless of how extreme it is. Defederating just means separation, it effectively does nothing to the content itself except make it very slightly harder to access.

    • BrerChicken @lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      What are you doing that you’re seeing so many posts about that? This is literally the first one I’ve seen in 3 days.