The Atlantic: Nobody Knows What’s Happening Online Anymore. Why you’ve probably never heard of the most popular Netflix show in the world.::undefined

  • _number8_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    6 months ago

    One of the worst catalysts of this is when channels started dropping entire seasons of shows at once online to appease le epic binge watching culture. But when everyone watches something new like that at once, there’s no time to actually appreciate anything or discuss the story or build anticipation, it just gets burned through and forgotten within 2 weeks.

    • Whelks_chance@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      6 months ago

      It does still allow for catch-up at the end of the run though. I prefer to binge watch, but now I wait a few months for it all to be released and then watch it. Which still doesn’t allow for week to week discussion, but fits my watching patterns better.

    • helenslunch@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      6 months ago

      Don’t know about you but I have no interest in discussing TV shows with anyone. They’re for my personal enjoyment.

      And I absolutely loathe being left on a cliffhanger every week and then having to remember to go back and check every Tuesday or whatever. Most often what happens is that I forget about or lose interest in the show entirely.

    • maegul@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      6 months ago

      Yea for sure.

      I think that whole thing of dropping whole seasons and how it’s kinda faded somewhat is an interesting case study of this particular internet culture moment.

      Where we think we want more and faster but have lost sight that that’s just a dumb dopamine mentality left unbalanced and unmitigated and that we actually prefer more traditional forms of various things.

      • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        6 months ago

        At the same time look at novels, when one comes out it doesn’t get released one 10 pages chapter at a time…

        • solrize@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          6 months ago

          Sometimes they do. Dickens and Tolstoy wrote and published serially. So do an awful lot of fanfic writers in the present day.

          • abbotsbury@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            6 months ago

            And then there was the weekly Dracula thing popular on Tumblr a few years ago where they take a non serialized novel (as far as I know) and split it up based on the dates of the correspondence within, going a level further than serialization and delivering the story “real time” as the letters and newspapers were sent/published in the story.

        • 📛Maven@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          Serial writing used to be a big thing, and even today there’s a reason for the popularity of fanfics and webnovels. Hell, remember Homestuck?

        • maegul@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          True. But then reading is probably a more self-limiting format than film/tv. At least for most people.

      • slumberlust@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        6 months ago

        The only reason they’ve gone back to slow drip releases is to milk your engagement and subscription.

        • Pips@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          Okay and what’s wrong with seeking engagement with whatever they’re making (which every person who makes anything does) and trying to ensure continued subscription, which makes sense given the business? I agree that streaming has generally become ridiculous and diluted, but there’s nothing inherently wrong with wanting people to watch stuff and attempting to ensure a steady revenue stream to do it.

          • slumberlust@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            Is watching the whole series not enough? For me it’s removing the option to choose my own pace. People can choose to watch slowly if they want, but you can’t binge if it’s not available. I dont even bother with shows until the whole season is out, so it’s limiting the engagement for me, but that’s my own preference.

            • Pips@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 months ago

              A lot of people cancel after watching the series. Releasing over several weeks allows for a continual revenue stream over those weeks. For people who like bingeing, the show is pretty much always up in full at the end of its run.