Title says it. Apparently lemmy devs are not concerned with such worldly matters as privacy, or respecting international privacy laws.

  • AlteredStateBlob@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    Yes, and my point is, that the person running an instance has to comply with the gdpr if they are within the EU.

    It doesn’t matter if data has already been propagated somewhere else. On that instance, data needs to be able to be fully deleted. For the matter of deletion, it is irrelevant where the data might have been pushed or mirrrored to, that is a seperate issue, which still needs to be dealt with. But one cannot argue that deleting is pointless or needn’t be implemented, just because “public” data is already mirrored elsewhere. The people running “elsewhere” have their own compliance to deal with.

    • FaceDeer@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      that is a seperate issue, which still needs to be dealt with.

      And my point is that expecting this to be “dealt with” is unrealistic. It’s going to continue existing on servers that are outside of your control and outside of the EU’s reach. No matter how hard the EU legislates or how hard you believe it should be possible to delete that data, it’s just not going to happen. Not without turning the world into a police state dystopia in the process, at any rate.

      I’m not saying “don’t implement post deletion.” Go ahead and do that if it makes you feel better. But making you feel better is all that it’s really going to accomplish, in the grand scheme of things. If you’re concerned about stuff you post “sticking around” even after you want it gone, nothing is going to actually solve that. The only option is to not post that stuff in the first place.

      • AlteredStateBlob@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        There already is federation of deletion. It’s not even something that needs to be implemented.

        I have less of a defeatist attitude about privacy. Same way I don’t think absitence is the only true way of contraconception. Privacy, yes, even if public spaces is possible. It’s not easy, it won’t just happen, but it is achievable. Needs a lot of work from a lot of people, but it is doable.

        I don’t expect you to change your mind on that.

        • FaceDeer@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          It’s an optional feature, there’s no way to ensure it actually gets respected. If it was universally implemented and it worked what would be the point of this whole thread to begin with?