I have setup so many instances over the months on different servers and the web ui always takes 40s to a minute to load per page I have always used redis for caching and the best methods even the aio docker image(s) are really slow.

kind of just been living with it for the past month or so but its really annoying when others are saying theirs takes seconds to load.

edit: totally didn’t forget to include a body

    • Human Crayon@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I am with you as well. I’ve had my instance up for 3 years on 4 cores and 8GB ram and each page loads in seconds. I’m not running anything crazy on it either (stock + 3ish extras). Hard drives are 4x sas in raid10.

  • poVoq@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Uhm, you will need to tell us more about your hardware or setup.

    I wouldn’t describe my Nextcloud as especially fast or optimized, but it is only around 20s from the login screen to being able to use it. And once you are logged in it is quite fast.

    • AbidanYre@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I had that same issue until I disabled the collabora extension. It’s much, much better now.

    • invaliduser@forum.bruvland.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      i have used all sort of hardware from a pi 4 to a vm on dell server with 2 vcpus and 8GB ram and now a vm on a custom server with 4 vcpus of a AMD Ryzen 9 5900X and 8GB ram using the docker aio I havent messed with it yet because i expected it to work

          • poVoq@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            The best is to run the database on an SSD, but move the data directory to a HDD for more storage.

  • Moonrise2473@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m using their apache docker and i don’t see many speed issues.

    I see issues instead with WordPress, my blog with 15000 pages but just 1000 visits a month takes 30 seconds to load a single page… Could not manage to improve it, even with extensive caching, percona, redis, and so on…

    One day I need to find the strength to migrate to Hugo (the automated tool makes a mess)

  • MangoPenguin@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’ve experienced the same, even the hosted/paid instances Nextcloud recommends are very slow.

    I think it’s just not built to be fast.

    • Moonrise2473@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      On my server it’s way much faster than WordPress (ok, being faster than the most bloated CMS is not that hard…)

  • MaggiWuerze@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    What Hardware are you using? My nextcloud takes at most a couple seconds and has only been getting faster these last few updates.

  • Hopfgeist@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Even on my obscure setup (NetBSD nvmm virtual machine running on NetBSD host using zfs) I get decent performance with PostgreSQL, and minimal PHP opcache and redis tuning. One thing is not to use too many php-fpm processes. I host a small private server for family and friends, and usually limit the number of processes to 8. The VM has 8 GB of RAM and 10 CPU cores, but the cores are slow by today’s standards.

    Very long delays on otherwise decent hardware (i. e. anything newer than 10 years) always smell of DNS problems, if the symptom is a very long wait time with nothing happening, and then a reasonably fast page rendering / UI loading.

    I’m quite happy with the performance, although some of the regular tasks seem to consume excessive amounts of “system” CPU time. But response time and preview rendering are all acceptable.

  • Auli@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    What database? I use Mariadb as a backend and have never had slowness like you describe. I guess also how many files?

  • ShittyKopper [they/them]@lemmy.w.on-t.work
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Because it’s ✨ modern ✨ and ✨ enterprise ✨

    Most new software not explicitly made for and by hobbyists will assume “just throw more hardware at it” to be a valid solution to inefficiency, and unfortunately Nextcloud (especially with any of the office extensions) seems to be heading that way.

  • Wander@yiffit.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m not running nextcloud myself, but have you checked that the database settings are scaled to match your server’s resources?

    • invaliduser@forum.bruvland.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      yeah i use mariadb with it and messed with the config but still nothing more than maybe 1 second same with enabling caching with redis and editing the php config i did get it down from 3-4 minutes though so thats something

        • invaliduser@forum.bruvland.comOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          4 cores 8GB ram and 500GB i looked at a resource monitor and the cpu barely hits 10% when im trying to load ages and the server is running other things

          • Wander@yiffit.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            Next thing that comes to mind is web server settings / threads / workers. But I’m afraid I can’t help you more since I’m not familiar with Nextcloud.

            • invaliduser@forum.bruvland.comOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              yeah i have increased them to the recommended settings and tried adding some but still cant get it to constantly load under a minute. i would put it down to the server being 100s of miles from me but even my server running in house is slow

  • RandomLegend [He/Him]@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Take a look into the logs, anything suspicious there? Maybe some timeouts, read/write errors, unresponsive tasks?

    What does your webserver say about resource usage for nextcloud? If you load it up, does it stay super low like not even giving it enough resource?

    • invaliduser@forum.bruvland.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      cpu is low 0.2% but ram seems fine using 2GB and looking at the logs in the web ui the only one i have really gotten is

      [PHP] Error: Doctrine\DBAL\Exception\DriverException: An exception occurred while executing a query: SQLSTATE[HY000]: General error: 7 FATAL:  terminating connection due to administrator command
      server closed the connection unexpectedly
      	This probably means the server terminated abnormally
      	before or while processing the request. at /var/www/html/3rdparty/doctrine/dbal/src/Driver/API/PostgreSQL/ExceptionConverter.php#91
      
      PUT /ocs/v2.php/apps/user_status/api/v1/heartbeat?format=json
      from 192.168.200.200 by admin at 2023-06-24T15:08:05+00:00
      
  • restlessyet@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    If you only want online file storage and sync, you may want to try Seafile. It’s a lot faster and has been rock solid since 10+ years for me. Not viable if you need some of the many nextcloud exentions though