• 567PrimeMover@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Data collected by Threads can include users’ sexual orientation, race and ethnicity, biometric data, trade union membership, pregnancy status, politics, and religious beliefs. Threads can also collect data on users’ employment, as well as health and fitness. Beyond that, the app also can collect data monitoring users’ location and other web activity.

    Geez meta, do you want the results of my colonoscopy too? (spoiler: they do)

    “Health and financial data, precise location, search history, browsing history, and more are not needed for a user to be on the app and are instead used to create a more hyper-personalized and targeted experience on the app or shared with and sold to advertisers,” Schroeder told Ars.

    Fuck targeted experiences, all my homies hate targeted experiences

  • CodaChroma@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m more interested in seeing the daily users in like a month or so. Tons of folks I know, including myself, are checking it out just bc it’s brand new. Personally, I’ve seen enough and it’s pretty garbo, and I’m guessing a lot of people will do the same.

    Folks will drop it because it’s cringe before they drop it for anything privacy related.

  • stanleytweedle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    ‘Despite’ seems out of place here. Those 30M users didn’t sign up ‘despite’ the flaws, they give no fucks about how flawed their social media is.

    Like me saying I eat bacon sandwiches despite the health consequences.

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I’m more disgusted and disappointed with humanity than surprised.

      There’s been a lot of discussion on here lately about the flaws of federated social media, but you know what the biggest one is? No marketing to point out to all these dipshits that there’s more to the Internet than Zuckerberg’s bullshit.

  • Ducks@ducks.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I know that Meta is awful for privacy, but being on Lemmy/Mastodon is not exactly private either. Everything you do on here is as public to Meta as Threads is. They can easily pull any data and metrics they’d like from the fediverse, even if instances defederate from them. There are plenty of other reasons to not like Threads but picking Mastodon over Threads because of privacy isn’t exactly changing that situation.

    • iusearchbtw@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      There’s a difference between the Fediverse exposing and federating your posts and likes, and Facebook’s aggressive harvesting of engagement data, device metrics, location, etc. With federation, they can only get a fraction of a fraction of the data they usually get.

    • Kinglink@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      You could say that about Facebook and yet it trundles on.

      Threads will be relevant because Meta has the money to keep making it relevant.

      Meta VR would have died by any other company, but Meta VR will stick around for quite a while because Zuckerberg money.

  • Kinglink@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    If you’re already accepting of Facebook, design flaws, and privacy concerns aren’t going to sway you from “The new thing”.