rosenjcb@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoYou cant even avoid irrelevant results with "site:" anymorelemmy.worldimagemessage-square22fedilinkarrow-up15arrow-down10
arrow-up15arrow-down1imageYou cant even avoid irrelevant results with "site:" anymorelemmy.worldrosenjcb@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square22fedilink
minus-squareQwerty-Space@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·edit-21 year agoSame here. DDG is so much better. And I love that I can do !mcwiki diamond to search the minecraft wiki for “diamonds” I ended up switching because Google changed their image search design that was just so much more difficult to browse
minus-squarescutiger@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 year agoMy problem with ddg is that I can’t refine my search by excluding keywords, only by adding more. For example, it’s frustrating if I’m looking to buy a product locally and half the page is Amazon results.
minus-squareQwerty-Space@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoYou can do that on ddg. See this link: http://duckduckgo.com/duckduckgo-help-pages/results/syntax
Same here. DDG is so much better. And I love that I can do
!mcwiki diamondto search the minecraft wiki for “diamonds”I ended up switching because Google changed their image search design that was just so much more difficult to browse
My problem with ddg is that I can’t refine my search by excluding keywords, only by adding more. For example, it’s frustrating if I’m looking to buy a product locally and half the page is Amazon results.
You can do that on ddg. See this link: http://duckduckgo.com/duckduckgo-help-pages/results/syntax