Lee Duna@lemmy.nz to News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoBernie Sanders calls on Congress to block funding to Israelwww.theguardian.comexternal-linkmessage-square132fedilinkarrow-up11.05Karrow-down123
arrow-up11.03Karrow-down1external-linkBernie Sanders calls on Congress to block funding to Israelwww.theguardian.comLee Duna@lemmy.nz to News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square132fedilink
minus-square𝘤𝘩𝘰𝘤𝘰𝘭𝘢𝘵𝘦𝘰@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up77arrow-down6·1 year agoMeanwhile congress is slap fighting over who gets to kill the poor
minus-squarechitak166@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down10·1 year agoBlame their constituencies.
minus-squarequeermunist she/her@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up18arrow-down8·1 year ago80% of Democrats support a ceasefire. Why don’t 80% of Democratic politicians?
minus-squarechitak166@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up6arrow-down9·1 year agoBecause they know they can get elected without opposing Israel. Which goes back to their constituency.
minus-squarequeermunist she/her@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up10arrow-down7·1 year agoWell when their choices on the ballot are to support Israel or support Israel, what is the constituency supposed to do?
minus-squarechitak166@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down9·1 year agoWhy are their choices only to support Israel?
minus-squarechitak166@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down15·edit-21 year agoWhat about it? Edit: He just downvoted me without an answer, so we can safely assume he has no real argument. It is the fault of the constituency. People can run for office while opposing Israel, but voters have been brainwashed into thinking otherwise.
minus-squarequeermunist she/her@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up8arrow-down9·edit-21 year agoI didn’t downvote you 🙄 there’s more people here than just us. People who run for office while opposing Israel end up with AIPAC targeting them. Next you’re going to say that it’s the constituency’s fault for big money deciding political races and that it shouldn’t matter that 100 million is being dumped to fight progressives. Running for congress takes money. Run for office while opposing Israel and your opponent will suddenly be flush with cash. It’s not the constituency’s fault that they’re being bombarded with propaganda and only presented with bad choices.
Meanwhile congress is slap fighting over who gets to kill the poor
Blame their constituencies.
80% of Democrats support a ceasefire.
Why don’t 80% of Democratic politicians?
Because they know they can get elected without opposing Israel.
Which goes back to their constituency.
Well when their choices on the ballot are to support Israel or support Israel, what is the constituency supposed to do?
Why are their choices only to support Israel?
AIPAC
What about it?
Edit: He just downvoted me without an answer, so we can safely assume he has no real argument.
It is the fault of the constituency. People can run for office while opposing Israel, but voters have been brainwashed into thinking otherwise.
*she
I didn’t downvote you 🙄 there’s more people here than just us.
People who run for office while opposing Israel end up with AIPAC targeting them. Next you’re going to say that it’s the constituency’s fault for big money deciding political races and that it shouldn’t matter that 100 million is being dumped to fight progressives.
Running for congress takes money. Run for office while opposing Israel and your opponent will suddenly be flush with cash.
It’s not the constituency’s fault that they’re being bombarded with propaganda and only presented with bad choices.