First U.S. nuclear reactor built from scratch in decades enters commercial operation in Georgia::ATLANTA — A new reactor at a nuclear power plant in Georgia has entered commercial operation, becoming the first new American reactor built from scratch in decades.

  • icydefiance@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    The cost of storing nuclear waste for a running plant is only a few hundred thousand a year; basically just just salary for a few people to transport it to a big hole in the ground.

    Decommissioning costs a few hundred million, which sounds like a lot, but for a project that lasts for decades it’s basically nothing.

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Or even less if we – gasp, shock, horror! – reprocessed it.

        (We don’t do that because of overblown fears about nuclear weapons proliferation.)

      • sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        The Department estimates that continued operation of the current fleet of nuclear power reactors could ~70,000 metric tons of uranium * increase the total inventory of spent fuel from 70,000 metric tons of uranium to 140,000 metric tons of uranium. Nearly all of this spent fuel is being stored at the reactor sites where it was generated, either submerged in pools of water (wet storage) or in shielded casks (dry storage). The Dept of Energy

        Those must be some big fucking trucks. And as far as I know, only Finland has actually developed any long-term storage which could be considered safe.

        Nuclear is fine, but nuclear fanboi takes are similar to weed fanbois, it’s not a perfect solution.

    • tony@lemmy.hoyle.me.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Estimated total cost of decommissioning in the UK is £120bn. But it’s going to take 100 years to do it… so yay lots of rotting radioactive buildings for the next century.

      The nuclear waste storage facility cost 53bn to build, let alone run… so way off your ‘few hundred thousand a year’.

      • icydefiance@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Estimated total cost of decommissioning in the UK is £120bn.

        That’s for way more than just one plant, and there’s a lot more going on that resulted in such a high price tag. That isn’t normal.

        The nuclear waste storage facility cost 53bn to build, let alone run

        It’s a reinforced hole in the ground, designed to last a long, long time after humans forget it exists. Of course it cost money to build, but now it’s just there. It doesn’t cost anything for it to continue to exist. Maybe there’s a little security or staff for some purpose, but I don’t know what they would even do.

        • paintbucketholder@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          That’s for way more than just one plant, and there’s a lot more going on that resulted in such a high price tag. That isn’t normal.

          No, that’s pretty normal. Current experience with decommissioning German nuclear power plants show that the cost is about $1.2 billion per power plant, and that decommissioning takes about 20 years.

          Of course it cost money to build, but now it’s just there.

          That doesn’t mean you simply get to ignore the $53 billion it cost to dig that hole.