fne8w2ah@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 11 months agoNYPD faces backlash as it prepares to encrypt radio communications | New York | The Guardianwww.theguardian.comexternal-linkmessage-square137fedilinkarrow-up1516arrow-down112cross-posted to: thepoliceproblem@lemmy.worldnews@lemmy.world
arrow-up1504arrow-down1external-linkNYPD faces backlash as it prepares to encrypt radio communications | New York | The Guardianwww.theguardian.comfne8w2ah@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 11 months agomessage-square137fedilinkcross-posted to: thepoliceproblem@lemmy.worldnews@lemmy.world
minus-squareJaymesRS@literature.cafelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·11 months agoNope, even never had any sort of analogous situation where armed civilians show up to insert themselves and potentially complicate matters: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/national/wp/2018/07/13/feature/in-all-reality-there-were-three-shooters-oklahomans-kill-an-active-shooter-and-its-not-as-simple-as-it-sounds/ do we need to encrypt ALL chatter… I never suggested we did. The original poster referenced a specific context of a “sensitive situation” and you asked for an example, so I provided one that could qualify.
Nope, even never had any sort of analogous situation where armed civilians show up to insert themselves and potentially complicate matters: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/national/wp/2018/07/13/feature/in-all-reality-there-were-three-shooters-oklahomans-kill-an-active-shooter-and-its-not-as-simple-as-it-sounds/
I never suggested we did. The original poster referenced a specific context of a “sensitive situation” and you asked for an example, so I provided one that could qualify.