Apple’s most valuable intangible asset isn’t its patents or copyrights - it’s an army of people who believe that using products from a $2.89 trillion multinational makes them members of an oppressed religious minority whose identity is coterminal with the interests of Apple’s shareholders.

If you’d like an essay-formatted version of this thread to read or share, here’s a link to it on pluralistic.net, my surveillance-free, ad-free, tracker-free blog:

https://pluralistic.net/2024/01/12/youre-holding-it-wrong/#if-dishwashers-were-iphones

1/

  • Cory Doctorow@mamot.frOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    This is a very weird idea. But weirder still is how it captured lawmakers, like the former Canadian Heritage Minister #JamesMoore. In 2010, Moore and his colleague, the disgraced sex pest #TonyClement, tabled a bill that would make it illegal for Canadians to modify their iPhones (and other gadgets) to work in ways that benefited them at the expense of corporate shareholders.

    14/

      • Cory Doctorow@mamot.frOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        This was a bridge too far. I’m a bestselling Canadian author whose copyright-related income is royalties, not industry campaign contributions. The Heritage Minister branding me a “radical extremist” got my goat, so I picked a fight with him on Twitter, where he unwisely took the bait:

        https://web.archive.org/web/20130407101911if_/http://eaves.ca/wp-content/uploads/2010/Conversations%20between%20@doctorow%20and%20@mpjamesmoore.jpg

        Moore’s responses were straight out of the comments from “If iPhones Were Dishwashers.” Quoth the Minister: “Don’t use Mac. There are other options out there.”

        16/

        • Tony Vladusich@mathstodon.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          @pluralistic@mamot.fr

          it’s so fucking funny how he repeatedly invokes “faith” in market forces. and to top it off later he invokes “faith” in consumers. fuck me, laughable corporate butt-licking scheisterism!

        • Cory Doctorow@mamot.frOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          Remember: the only people who could use an alternative iOS store are Apple customers. Moore - a Minister from the Conservative Party - went on record saying that if you want to use your private, personal property in ways that the corporation that manufactured it objects to you, the government should step in to defend the corporation from you.

          This is not the property-worshiping, market-based ideology the Conservative Party claims to support.

          17/

          • Cory Doctorow@mamot.frOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            The only way to square that circle is if somehow, the people who want to install apps on their phones without the manufacturer’s approval are not really customers. They’re pretenders. Apostates. They’re holding it wrong:

            https://www.wired.com/2010/06/iphone-4-holding-it-wrong/

            These religious apologetics for Apple’s business practices are a devastatingly effective defense against the public outcry that would accrue to any other business that abused its customers in similar fashion.

            18/

            • Cory Doctorow@mamot.frOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              Every time Apple finds a new way to cheat its customers, the cult is there to insist those aren’t true Apple customers at all!

              Think of Apple’s years-long war on repair. When Apple gets a veto over where you fix the small, slippery, glass object you carry everywhere and hence break a lot, they can get up to all kinds of mischief. They can gouge you on parts and service charges, sure. But they can also simply rule out fixing your device at all, declaring it beyond repair.

              19/

              • Cory Doctorow@mamot.frOP
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                8 months ago

                This prompts you to buy another gadget from them, and they get to offer you a trade-in. That means that your old gadget gets “recycled” by Apple, who - uniquely among electronics manufacturers - drops all its “recycled” gadgets in giant shredders, ensuring that parts from old phones don’t find their way into the secondary market for use by independent repair:

                https://pluralistic.net/2022/05/22/apples-cement-overshoes/

                20/

                  • Cory Doctorow@mamot.frOP
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    8 months ago

                    When repair advocates pointed out that this was creating mountains of immortal #ewaste that included tons of #ConflictMinerals, Apple’s religious adherents stepped into insist that Apple customers preferred to get their iPhone fixed by Apple and its approved depots.

                    22/

          • arceuthobium@mastodon.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            @pluralistic@mamot.fr this is the same mistake made when people misconstrue “Property is theft.” An iPhone is a possession, not property. Apple shares are property.