Was just talking at dinner with family, and it seems a logical action to ban circumcision, as in most cases, doesn’t have consent, and is a major (genitals are important) body modification. Can we ban it at the state level? Just a thought.

  • Grass@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Wasn’t there also that weird ass bible tale where some dude brought another guy 200 foreskins so he could marry the guy’s daughter? If I don’t have one, at least nobody will kill me and take it from me to give to a potential father in law…

    I still have to give the little fucker a good scrub to not stink though so the cleanliness thing has got to be bull.

    • frickineh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Yeah. I get that it’s supposed to represent how many enemies he killed, but why foreskins, Saul? Could’ve asked for a lot of other things besides dick skin. Like, idk, their weapons or something.

      • Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        Because you could buy or steal their weapons, but there’s only one way you’re going to end up with a piece of their dick. Also means you don’t get to count enemies who were Jews.