• DigitalFrank@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      10 months ago

      I’m neither a Constitutional scholar nor a lawyer. I’ll go with Marbury v Madison as who gets to decide those finer points.

      And they decided 9-0.

        • DigitalFrank@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          10 months ago

          their own ballots

          Not federal ballots.

          Except a state tried here and got slapped down 9-0. Seems to me it was deemed unconstitutional by the folks that decide that sort of thing.

          • ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            10 months ago

            Not federal ballots.

            Until today, YES, federal ballots. Refer back to the Constitution.

            Except a state tried here and got slapped down 9-0. Seems to me it was deemed unconstitutional by the folks that decide that sort of thing.

            Today. For the first time. And with exceptionally questionable grounds.

            Look at you trying so hard to retcon your bad faith arguments, lol.

            • DigitalFrank@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              8
              ·
              10 months ago

              Lol. It’s ok to disagree with the decision. It’s ok to be mad at the decision. It’s ok to internet argue the constitutionality of the decision. All of it makes this >< much difference. Trump will be on the ballot, will be the nominee, and will be absolutely crushed by the most popular president in history. I don’t know why anyone is worried.