• jmp242@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    9 months ago

    I hear this a lot, but what would beating the Taliban involve? While the US was there, the Taliban was at best in hiding, it was not holding territory. If you mean removing the very idea of the Taliban from the world? That is both hard to do and arguably also a genocide, at least a cultural one. The US has been good at that, but it’s also frowned on in the current world - see Gaza headlines.

    This is also why I’d suggest it’s kind of impossible to both not be the worst of the colonialist systems and stop terrorism (and it’s kind of unclear that even the colonial cultural suppression / conversion / excesses / crimes actually would stop terrorism).

    • driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      what would beating the Taliban involve?

      What about taking more than 5 minutes to the Taliban to come back in power after the us left?

      • jmp242@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        9 months ago

        That seems a strange definition to me - so if a boxer gets back up after losing the match, well his opponent didn’t beat him in that fight?

        • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          Are you under the impression that the US military and the Taliban were engaged in friendly competition for no reason whatsoever, just a bit of international banter?