OK. So, let’s just assume, just theoretically, someone in your future let’s you know you don’t have a great sense of humor, feel free to come back and read those comments again.
I never said I don’t get it, just implied it isn’t funny. And it obviously isn’t to many people here judging by the votes.
By using fancy terms and feeling the need to link an explanation (the link is broken, by the way) you now give it a self-opinionated flair. Maybe you’re the weird one.
I’m sorry that I explained a joke to someone who said they didn’t get it.
I suppose the logical thing to do if you don’t think a joke is funny is to complain about it in the comments though, particularly at people who didn’t make the joke who just explained it to someone else.
OK. So, let’s just assume, just theoretically, someone in your future let’s you know you don’t have a great sense of humor, feel free to come back and read those comments again.
So, you don’t understand how a non-sequiter can be amusing, and so … I’m not funny because I understood a joke?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non_sequitur_(literary_device
There’s something deeply weird about people insisting that humor has to be logical.
I never said I don’t get it, just implied it isn’t funny. And it obviously isn’t to many people here judging by the votes.
By using fancy terms and feeling the need to link an explanation (the link is broken, by the way) you now give it a self-opinionated flair. Maybe you’re the weird one.
You think non-sequiter is a fancy term?
I’m sorry that I explained a joke to someone who said they didn’t get it.
I suppose the logical thing to do if you don’t think a joke is funny is to complain about it in the comments though, particularly at people who didn’t make the joke who just explained it to someone else.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non_sequitur_(literary_device)
There’s the fixed link. Not sure why the encoding went funky.