Atom@lemmy.world to Nuclear@sh.itjust.works · 1 year agoGreens keep ignoring energy density and therefore land use to make the case for a "greener" 100% wind/solar/hydro gridlemmy.worldexternal-linkmessage-square35fedilinkarrow-up1110arrow-down128
arrow-up182arrow-down1external-linkGreens keep ignoring energy density and therefore land use to make the case for a "greener" 100% wind/solar/hydro gridlemmy.worldAtom@lemmy.world to Nuclear@sh.itjust.works · 1 year agomessage-square35fedilink
minus-squareThreeHalflings@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up12arrow-down1·edit-21 year agoYou seem upset about wind, solar and hydro yet your post doesn’t seem to mention them. How is that related to the post?
minus-squarepaysrenttobirds@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up3·1 year agoPost doesn’t mention land use either. Whole title is non-sequitur, or whatever the reverse of that is. I’m green and on the fence about nuclear but today’s “spontaneous” crop of braindead pro-nuclear memes is not helping their case.
You seem upset about wind, solar and hydro yet your post doesn’t seem to mention them. How is that related to the post?
Post doesn’t mention land use either. Whole title is non-sequitur, or whatever the reverse of that is. I’m green and on the fence about nuclear but today’s “spontaneous” crop of braindead pro-nuclear memes is not helping their case.