So I have finally built my NAS. I used an N100 CPU because I saw it has low power consumption.

Right now I have 2 NVMe SSDs and 2 HDDs. I have installed proxmox on the 2 SSDs as RAID1. I have not partitioned the HDDs yet, they are just plugged in and powered on.

Just booting into proxmox, without any VMs or containers running, I am pulling 45W from the wall. This looks super high to me, and I’m afraid that starting to use the HDDs and running some VMs may double this…

I don’t have much references, but I have an Odroid with an external self-powered HDD, it is using 5W. I have a raspberry pi 4 with an external HDD, the raspberry is pulling 3W and the HDD 3W.

With these data, I was thinking I wouldn’t go over 20W. 45W is enormous and not something I can run 24/7, kind of a fail for a NAS…

Have I done something wrong or is it just how much it’s supposed to pull?

Edit: I have come across powertop. Using the auto tune, I was able to drop to 33-35W. I have unplugged the HDDs and dropped to 22W. I guess I cannot go lower, this may be because of the PSU or the 2 NVMe

  • JASN_DE@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    8 months ago

    You’re not going to see similar power levels to those ARM devices. A massive part will be the drives, 3.5" drives take between 6 and 10W per drive while running.

    • Kwa@derpzilla.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      I’m going to try to unplug these. But even if I remove 20W from the 2 HDDs, there are still 25W which seem a lot

      • JASN_DE@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        8 months ago

        You’re building a machine from parts. Different Mainboard, PSU, CPU and drive combinations. No real way for a system manufacturer to optimize for a specific use case and power target.

        The full ATX PSU alone has a widely variable efficiency, and often not down in the low double digit power areas.

  • hperrin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    See if you can set the max power of the CPU in the BIOS.

    It’s really strange for an N100 system to be drawing that much power, so maybe you have some really hungry SSDs or HDDs.

    • umbrella@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      you can also do this in the OS, depending on your hardware it might be more reliable.

    • Kwa@derpzilla.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      I have checked but I haven’t seen anything about power. By any chances, do you know in what category it may be?

  • darcmage@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Monitor CPU usage and frequencies to ensure CPU is throttling down properly. Then start unplugging hard drives, ram, nic cable to see how they affect power usage. Servethehome shows an N305 idling around 10w in a minipc without HDDs.

    • Kwa@derpzilla.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      I guess I’ll do this if I don’t find a way to reduce the power consumption

      • darcmage@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Troubleshooting can be difficult. I’ll only say you’ll save yourself alot of time and energy by establishing a baseline for power usage with just the essential components necessary for boot to see what you’re working with. Then you can make better informed decisions.

        • Kwa@derpzilla.netOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          Yes definitely. This is just that it was my first time assembling a PC. I had a bit of a hard time and I am not in a hurry to disassemble it 😅

          That may change in a couple of days thought

  • poVoq@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    8 months ago

    For power consumption, NVMe drives use quite a lot of power, especially PCIe 4.0 ones. About 5W each during use.

    3.5" HDD (especially 7200rpm or more) also consume significantly more than 2.5" 5400rpm HDDs that are optimized for low power (the latter use about 1W during use).

    SATA SSDs fall somewhere in the middle.

    • Kwa@derpzilla.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      Thanks. So If I take 5W a disk, I may have 20W just from the disks.

      There are still 25W remaining. For a low power CPU that looks like a lot 😕

      • poVoq@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        I never really tested it with 3.5" HDDs, but a google search makes it sound like they might be closer to 10W each.

      • rambos@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        My guess would be 25W from disks, 10W from CPU+RAM+MBO and 10W waste from PSU. Just a guess as I said

    • CyprianSceptre@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      How does that work out in terms of energy consumption though?

      If NVMe is at least 10x faster, but consumes 5x more power, it will use less energy to read or write the same amount of data overall.

      • poVoq@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        To answer that question one would need to dive deeply into idle vs. in active use power consumption. It’s not like a NAS gets turned off when not in use.

      • rambos@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        My server use about the same power no matter if its idle or under full load, so I dont think drive speed makes any difference. My SSDs use much less than my HDD anyway

    • BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      I’m surprised to hear NVMe us that much power - I had no idea, and just assumed they used very little.

      It sounds like from a power perspective that 2.5" is better, and SSD is lowest power?

      • MangoPenguin@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        They use practically nothing when idle, but it spikes up dramatically under heavy load.

        Still much less on average than a HDD that uses 5-10W even when idle and spun up.

      • poVoq@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        In my limited testing 2.5 HDD uses the least power, and SATA SSDs are slightly worse than those, but I guess it also depends on the model.

  • paf@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    8 months ago

    Do also have a n100 processor running proxmox with 3 VM. Can’t try right now but can come back in a few days to let you know how much power it draws

    • Kwa@derpzilla.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Thanks that would be cool. Also if you can tell me if this is a NUC or something larger.

      • DreadPotato@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        I’m not the other user, but this is my NUC running proxmox with 2 VMs and 2 LXCs. Running with an old i3, 16gb ram and a single 1tb NVME, no mechanical HDDs, and a few USB peripherals like a ZigBee dongle.

      • paf@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        So pc is consuming 13W, this is with one nvme + one SSD, pic at 30w for a few seconds at boot.

      • whereisk@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        I’m running a n100 16gb with a 256ssd, 4vms and 4 docker images, it’s pulling 7-9w.

        • Kwa@derpzilla.netOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          Thanks, this is really efficient. I now have good hopes that changing my PSU should bring me closer to this

          • whereisk@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            8 months ago

            It’s literally one of those little known brand nuc, tiny box - beelink I think. Total cost $200 or so - it’s been running non stop for the last 3 months without an issue. I don’t think it even has a fan in there.

            • paf@jlai.lu
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              Curious, might have same machine but do consume a bit more, do you have one SSD + one nvme?

              • whereisk@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                8 months ago

                Sorry, I must have been too tired, got nearly all details wrong: 32GB RAM 1TB M.2, USB3.2, BT4.2,WiFi 5,4k HDMI, Gigabit Port, and not a Beelink but a DreamQuest. There’s just the M2 interface disk connected, no SSD.

          • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            You still won’t see that low of power consumption when you have something custom built.

            With that being said you have a lot of room for improvement

  • SayCyberOnceMore@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    8 months ago

    Another way of reducing your overall power consumption: Do you need a NAS to be on 24/7?

    My NAS is a NAS - just storage. It comes on and spins the 5x HDDs for a few hours in the day then shuts down. It’s a NAS, I don’t need to access my files at night when I’m asleep.

    My VM host is a low power box with passive cooling which uses a SSD and runs my (mostly idle) VMs 24/7 for a few Watts.

    So, maybe splitting up your requirements might save some power?

    • Kwa@derpzilla.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      I planned to share it with my family. As I won’t be the only user, this is not ideal. Besides I run automatic backup and planned to also store them in the NAS. So again if it’s off half the time, this is not ideal.

  • BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Is that 45w a continuous draw, or is that from something that measured it while booting?

    I have a small form factor Dell Optiplex with 1 NVME for the OS (Proxmox), and 3 drives (2.5" spinning disk), that idles at 10-20w. Running VM’s pushes that up to 40-50w.

    And that’s still about 60-70w less than the desktop I’ve been running as a file server!

    • Kwa@derpzilla.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Unfortunately this is idling after boot. While booting it jumps to 70W and I haven’t seen it go below 45W idling…

      • BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Guess it’s time to disconnect some hardware and test power consumption.

      • poVoq@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        EVGA 500 W1

        That is a 500W PSU, no? That is vastly oversized and therefore inefficient for low power applications.

          • rambos@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            8 months ago

            I was testing around 5 different PSUs (500-750W silver/gold) on the same machine and I was reading 20 - 35W from the wall. So yeah I think PSU plays a big role. They are most efficient at around half of the rated load and we are using them at <10%.

            • czardestructo@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              8 months ago

              Listen to this guy! Spot on. When I built my server I spent more time researching and paying for the PSU more than any other single part. Ended up with a Seasonic PRIME FANLESS PX-450. Server idles around 25W with a ryzen 5600g and 40TB of storage.

              • poVoq@slrpnk.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                8 months ago

                While more expensive, a fanless one is probably a good idea as it will be optimized to avoid excess heat, which is incidently the same as inefficient power consumption for PSUs.

              • Kwa@derpzilla.netOP
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                8 months ago

                Indeed, this seems to be the issue!

                I’ve checked the PX-450 but it seems to be out of stock…

                I’ll do more searches about PSU, thanks!

          • poVoq@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            8 months ago

            Recommendations from such “Homelab” sites are generally not sound advise for people trying to optimize power consumption. They will happily recommend “server grade” hardware that will use hundreds of Watts easily.

            While I think the PSU contributes to the problem, it is probably a set of different factors that all drive up the consumption.

            Low power regular desktop PSUs are a bit hard to find on the consumer market as there is no demand for them, but you could look into PicoPSUs with an external power-brick.

  • Decronym@lemmy.decronym.xyzB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Acronyms, initialisms, abbreviations, contractions, and other phrases which expand to something larger, that I’ve seen in this thread:

    Fewer Letters More Letters
    LXC Linux Containers
    NAS Network-Attached Storage
    NUC Next Unit of Computing brand of Intel small computers
    NVMe Non-Volatile Memory Express interface for mass storage
    PCIe Peripheral Component Interconnect Express
    PSU Power Supply Unit
    SATA Serial AT Attachment interface for mass storage
    SSD Solid State Drive mass storage

    8 acronyms in this thread; the most compressed thread commented on today has 6 acronyms.

    [Thread #604 for this sub, first seen 15th Mar 2024, 17:15] [FAQ] [Full list] [Contact] [Source code]