• admiralteal@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    73
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Congress members get as many votes for war as they have draft-age family members. For each vote they cast, they must enlist 1 family member. Starting with their own children.

      • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        38
        ·
        1 year ago

        Some of em don’t care about their kids.

        As evidenced by their complete lack of concern regarding climate change.

    • bobs_monkey@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      1 year ago

      Nah just ship the congressmen/women off with the infantry. Then they can see exactly what they’re voting for.

    • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      1 year ago

      Given the low regard for their children and grandchildren they show when it comes to climate change, I doubt that would be an adequate deterrent.

      • flossdaily@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Senators are (with few exceptions) extraordinarily wealthy. When climate change is destroying crops and making some areas uninhabitable, these senators’ families will still be living very comfortably.

    • Jim@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      I see an obvious exploit with this: congress members enlisting family members who would rather vote ‘No’ just so they can get more votes for their own choice.

      You might think “nobody would enlist their child to fight a war that they’re against” but I promise you, there are people like that.

    • theneverfox@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      We basically had that a century ago, before the nobility moved behind the scenes and became the 1%

      Unqualified scions were sent to the battlefield to gain military merits, which was generally bad for everyone. I’m pretty sure it only really stopped after WWI, when the death toll from combat started getting ridiculous

    • bauhaus@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      many have already gladly voted yes for both many times. I don’t think that will stop enough of them.