return2ozma@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 9 months agoDemocrats who attack the rich do better in elections. The party should take noticewww.theguardian.comexternal-linkmessage-square121fedilinkarrow-up1975arrow-down120cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up1955arrow-down1external-linkDemocrats who attack the rich do better in elections. The party should take noticewww.theguardian.comreturn2ozma@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 9 months agomessage-square121fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-squareripcord@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down1·9 months agoThat’s not supporting evidence.
minus-squareTinidril@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down5·9 months ago“That which can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence.” Where is the evidence to the contrary? That was the original assertion.
minus-squareripcord@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down1·9 months agoNo, it wasn’t. I asked for evidence for a claim. You didn’t give one.
That’s not supporting evidence.
“That which can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence.”
Where is the evidence to the contrary? That was the original assertion.
No, it wasn’t.
I asked for evidence for a claim. You didn’t give one.