• fishos@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    8 months ago

    You said it so perfectly and I never realized it. “If you elect our guy, he won’t be able to do anything, but at least it’s better than if you elect the other guy. If you elect the other guy, somehow he’ll be able to do everything he wants. But vote for our impotent guy instead. It’s safe!”

    Um what?

    • candybrie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      One follows the rules, and the other often doesn’t even think there are rules. The difference there isn’t hard to suss out. It’s like that joke about playing chess with a pigeon.

      • beardown@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        I want a guy who doesn’t think there are rules, and will protect ponies. Why isn’t that a possibility

        • candybrie@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          Because not thinking there are rules into adulthood is a pretty self-absorbed trait, which usually doesn’t go along with things like empathy and compassion.

          • beardown@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            8 months ago

            There aren’t rules. Trump is proof of that

            A socialist with that same attitude towards rules, norms, and civility would be the ideal option. That isn’t possible under our system. However, a fascist with those views is possible.

            And the neoliberal erosion of living standards will just make the fascists more appealing to normal people. So if the fascists don’t win in 2024 then they’ll win in the near future unless we have a massive expansion of the welfare state that helps median Americans, not just the incredibly poor