• Strykker@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      The answer was in the fucking title and you still got it wrong!

      Sure on a pure production based outlook ebikes would be worse since they require more material.

      But e bikes allow people to go further, and encourage people to use them more often, meaning an ebike will replace more car trips than a standard bike would. This can end up offsetting the extra costs of producing the ebike in the first place.

      • Uranium3006@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        For things like hills and keeping up with traffic ebikes are a game changer. I literally couldn’t go on half the trips I take without the motor

    • poVoq@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Apparently a fancy lightweight aluminium frame regular bike can be worse in terms of resources used for producing it, compared to a regular ebike with a steel frame. I guess this also counts for titanium and carbon-fiber frames.

      • AchtungDrempels@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        I mean, i guess, but there are aluminium, carbon and titanium ebikes too.

        I like that ebikes get people out of their cars, and they also get a whole different demographic riding, which in turn - at least i have the hope - will lead to way broader parts of society wanting better infra.