The argument was that Netanyahu was a favorable candidate in Israel for the purpose of an emerging multipolar world. Call that anti-west, pro-west, anti-Israel, pro-Israel, etc. as you please. I don’t believe a single word coming from Hinkle. that’s my view
he was defending Netanyahu as being ‘anti-west’ before Oct 7
Really? I’ve been loosely following him for a while and he seemed to be consistently anti-Israel.
The argument was that Netanyahu was a favorable candidate in Israel for the purpose of an emerging multipolar world. Call that anti-west, pro-west, anti-Israel, pro-Israel, etc. as you please. I don’t believe a single word coming from Hinkle. that’s my view
Yeah, I stand corrected, he has absolutely no principles lmao.