• paraphrand@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    “To test new ways to improve the experience.”

    Read:

    “To test new ways to juice engagement and watch time. We are seeing if this leads to further addiction.”

  • Onno (VK6FLAB)@lemmy.radio
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    YouTube keeps making things worse.

    A few months ago they required that you have a watch history to display the homepage.

    This week they’re showing up next popups even when you have autoplay turned off.

    Using an Apple TV I probably watch more YouTube than any other platform and was given a gift of a premium subscription. It removed all ads, gave me YouTube music, but the shitty experiments continue and there’s no way to tell YouTube to sod off.

    I’ve yet to find an alternative, but I’m looking…

  • VinceUnderReview@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Judging by the seemingly overwhelmingly negative response, we don’t see YouTube moving forward with this design. But tell us what you think. Let us know in the comments below.

    This is a misunderstanding of how google works I think.

  • Ultragigagigantic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    It’s pointless to be on any platform in control of someone like this. Enshitification will come one day no matter what happens.

    It’s open source and self hosted, or barbarism.

  • SlakrHakr@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    What a strange title. Immediately biases the reader before any actual information is given about the change

    • systemglitch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      No trust me, it is an accurate title. I thought I was using some shit site hosting YouTube videos at first. It’s atrocious.

    • woelkchen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Immediately biases the reader before any actual information is given about the change

      As someone who has the “pleasure” to be selected as beta tester for YouTube changes all the time, I fully agree with the headline because I also have immediate bias when they change something. Every single time it has been awful and more often than not I get outright broken changes which is why I have a user agent changer installed to switch to an ancient Edge user agent when affected because YT’s legacy UI often doesn’t get the same changes.

      Also, I’m a YT Premium subscriber. I’m not paying to be a beta tester.

      • danc4498@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Maybe by setting the expectation that the user will hate the update, when it becomes available to everyone it won’t be as bad as expected and thus more easily accepted.

    • Rolivers@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Yeah well. So far enshittification hasn’t stopped yet. It’s perfectly reasonable to assume a change is for the worse.

  • manucode@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    It’s okay, as long as you don’t want to read the comments or the video description