You must log in or register to comment.
And if he doesn’t, thats a “loss” for some reason. Nothing is actually lost mind you, there is no 7.5 trillion pounds of baby meat in a dump somewhere.
Nevertheless, we’ve fired the CEO and given him 6 billion pounds of baby meat for failing.
And he gets another sweet gig with another big company because he’s got “experience”
It was a loss because the CEO had already received an MBO in percentage of planned growth
Reminds me of the Reddit CEO who was sobbing that Reddit is not profitable (and that’s why they had to block 3rd party apps) while receiving a $200 million salary.
Obligatory xkcd/605
show
They also expects if a woman can give birth to a baby in nine months, nine women only need one month to “produce” a baby. Or even just eight or seven women, because of synergy effects.
My calculations show that around the age of 80 he will be massive enough to turn earth into a black hole if evenly distributed onto its volume
Edit: actually by the age of 30, because I misread the current age to be 12 months
And how will this affect the stock price?
Positively, probably, as the stock will get to the moon literally and long before that moment
These people think the only kind of growth is exponential.
Because they don’t know anything that grows faster than exponential, and anything that grows slower doesn’t look as good in the reports
Slower growth is worse than faster growth. I want 10 million next week not next year.
This kind of capitalism is a disease.
Now, if that isn’t some sound empirical reasoning, I don’t know what is!
