It bugs me when people say “the thing is is that” (if you listen for it, you’ll start hearing it… or maybe that’s something that people only do in my area.) (“What the thing is is that…” is fine. But “the thing is is that…” bugs me.)

Also, “just because <blank> doesn’t mean <blank>.” That sentence structure invites one to take “just because <blank>” as a noun phrase which my brain really doesn’t want to do. Just doesn’t seem right. But that sentence structure is very common.

And I’m not saying there’s anything objectively wrong with either of these. Language is weird and complex and beautiful. It’s just fascinating that some commonly-used linguistic constructions just hit some people wrong sometimes.

  • ℕ𝕖𝕞𝕠@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    I really can’t stand when someone says something happened, or they did something, “on accident”.

    No. You do something on purpose or by accident.

    • Hegar@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      6 months ago

      I vaguely remember hearing that you can know whether someone was born before or after a specific year, depending on whether they use by or on accident.