• MrJameGumb@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    98
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    You forgot the third car using a VPN to get all the content they’re actually paying for on all of their streaming apps

    • cm0002@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      6 months ago

      Bout to be CO too, not just limited to red states unfortunately.

      Admittedly, it’s not just for porn, but social media in general. Either way, the same reasoning applies, I’m not giving a third party company my identity just for a social media account and I’m certainly not going to do it for porn

      • Cethin@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        6 months ago

        Several states with republican leadership have required identification to view sites that have “adult content”. You technically can still access it without a VPN in these states, but I’m not trusting these sites with personally identifying information. Depending on the state I think you have to upload an image of your ID and other information. It’s really sketchy.

        • sznowicki@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          What the fucking fuck. In Europe this would cause French and Germans combined beheading entire governments. One thing I want to keep to myself is my porn choices. Giving my ID to a porn site sounds like a big fucking NO

          • Cethin@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 months ago

            I think they’re looked up to verify they’re authentic. I’m not certain, but I’m pretty sure that’s the case. If it isn’t then it’d be easier to just take an image of a real ID and modify it rather than using image generation to hope it comes out correct.

    • Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 months ago

      Oh man, this is a much better comparison.

      It’s still not perfect, though, since technically porn isn’t banned, but it’s effectively banned by requiring ID checking, which major websites like pornhub refuse to do.

      But this also allegedly targets “culture”, just like China’s great firewall. It’s pretty damn stupid.

    • unalivejoy@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Specifically American tiktok. The tiktok they have isn’t the same. Iirc It’s only educational stuff, and you get a time limit.

  • NeatNit@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    6 months ago

    Off topic but I really enjoyed much of this show (Umbrella Academy), particularly I was so impressed with how the child actor actually pulled off carrying the entire show, he was not only the leading & most interesting character but also IMO had one of the best performances on it. Come to think of it, I should look into what else he’s done.

    Anyway, what episode is this from, do you know? (I know it’s just a meme format now, worth a shot tho)

    Excellent post btw, I gave all the upvote I could

    • Grass@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      6 months ago

      The umbrella academy was hard carried by five. The actor really pulled off the adult stuck in a kid’s body thing. The actor that played the guy with addiction issues was great too.

      • MrJameGumb@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        6 months ago

        If you like Klaus you should watch a show the same actor did years ago called Misfits! He kind of carried that show too, it was never quite as good after he left lol

        • tfw_no_toiletpaper@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 months ago

          I actually watched the whole first season with a buddy of mine but couldn’t get myself to like it. Only good thing was all that bri’ish swearing

        • DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 months ago

          Yeah I stopped watching when he did. It was teen drama before, which I’m normally not a fan of, but he made it worth it. Without him it was just another “teens get crazy powers, hijinks ensue” show.

          • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            It was one of the first “teens misuse crazy powers” I saw.

            Lactokinesis was an excellent superpower.

            However, After the time travel was resolved there wasn’t much left to keep long term interest.

          • MrJameGumb@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 months ago

            I kept watching for a few more seasons. There was enough of the original cast left that it wasn’t bad per se, but it wasn’t the same. I finally had to give up during that season where the guy was screaming about his missing cock the whole time lol

    • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      I’m introducing my partner to the show now. We’re just about to finish S1. Gotta be ready when the final season drops.

  • Lasherz12@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    6 months ago

    They’re gonna be real disappointed with the version of “Tiktok” available in China

  • mechoman444@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    6 months ago

    This is the kind of thing that gets to me in this whole TikTok situation the most.

    China bans most American based social media and what it doesn’t ban is heavily monitored censored and regulated.

    Why would we (Americans) want to willingly use a Chinese owned/based/operated social media platform like TikTok?

    We should never have started using it in the first place or at least immediately dropped it as soon as it became common knowledge that it had substantial ties to china.

    There is so much hypocrisy on all sides of this issue.

    • archomrade [he/him]@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      37
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      6 months ago

      What’s funny about this is that the fear of Chinese Authoritarianism leads Americans straight into American Authoritarianism.

      It’s this close to self awareness and then veers straight into hypocrisy

      • nymwit@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 months ago

        It does smack of hypocrisy but I’ve been feeling more it’s a paradox of tolerance thing. Which itself a sort of hypocrisy now that I’m thinking about it. Huh.

        • archomrade [he/him]@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          nah, i don’t see it as a tolerance issue at all, I see it more through a Chomsky/Foucault lens.

          US social media has been used as a state messaging apparatus for going on two decades now, and a foreign-owned platform is simply not as responsive to US state pressure as a domestically-owned one. China was simply playing the same game as the US has been. It’s not at all surprising that the US would want to ban one that has gotten to be so widely used - but what’s funny about it is the messaging/logic used to do so.

          “A communist authoritarian actor is influencing civilian opinion through media curation, so we must take drastic authoritarian action to control media curation to stop foreign influence of civilian opinion.”

          I think seeing it through a ‘paradox of tolerance’ lens kinda misses the point of the irony I see in the response.

      • markon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Well, they probably read Machiavelli and may not always have our best interests at heart so it’s not inconceivable it’s entirely intentional.

    • Vytle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      We are not in China, are we? The (american) government should NOT have control over what information its citizens have access to. We should not strive to be like China in this regard.

      • zewm@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 months ago

        I think they mean that the users shouldn’t use it. Not that the government should ban it.

    • sudo@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      China censors what its people sees on its platforms so its people started using facebook. Then China started demanding that facebook censor itself in China (there was a major terror attack that sparked this) but Facebook refused so they banned it. Same thing happened with reddit and such.

      Meanwhile, the US started censoring its major media platforms people either fled to niche libre sites like this or the shiny new addictive app from China. China doesnt care about what americans see. It’ll happily let americans see Israelis document their war crimes. The US said, sell to american investors, and be censored or be banned. ByteDance chose being banned. Welcome to the great american firewall.

      • TwinTusks@bitforged.space
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 months ago

        I don’t know if Chinese government actually reaches out to social platforms before banning them, I remember reddit was avaliable in China in 2015 - 2016ish. Then it got banned, I believe its because of its political contents (r/china and such).

    • EmperorHenry@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      6 months ago

      China bans most American based social media

      they’ve banned all the big ones except youtube, but their version of youtube is extremely censored.

    • Dozzi92@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      6 months ago

      It’s the VPN’s service.

      Anytime I see a misplaced apostrophe I assign some kind ownership to it. This one’s okay.

    • andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      Please, don’t even touch this. With our RKN and useless pinnocchios banning random things extrajudiciously, I’d be surprised if we’d have any access to the internet in 2026. For those without a government issued pass and active service in bot farms, I mean. If I’d get limited to local resources, I feel like I’d give up on internet altogether. Can’t discuss shit there without pseudo-trad weirdos chiming in.

      It may be a major plus for the Internet as a whole if the cable is cut completely, but I feel like it’d only be cut for dissenting folks, while carriers of the official talking points wouldn’t ever get limited.

  • Lila_Uraraka@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    6 months ago

    Fun fact, China doesn’t even have TikTok, their version is strictly educational and can only be used certain times of the day, to my understanding

    • TwinTusks@bitforged.space
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      6 months ago

      is strictly educational and can only be used certain times of the day

      Nope and nope. Like normak tiktok, douyin have all sort of things, depends on what you view. You can login to it (doesn’t have to), and the account is connect to your cellphone number which is connected to your national ID. I don’t know if theres time limitations if you are a minor though.

    • FeelThePower@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      6 months ago

      I’ve sideloaded douyin before, it isn’t strictly educational but I do believe if a child is using the device there is time limits. and also you can’t sign up without a Chinese ID but it doesn’t require an account. I actually did find some Americans on there who somehow found a way to sign up.

      • orangeboats@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        6 months ago

        The IDs of criminals are sometimes leaked on the web. People use those leaked IDs to register their account. Many systems don’t actually check whether the ID is already registered, it works as long as the ID itself is valid.

        • markon@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          Lol lazy CCP. Now that optimization is going brr that probably won’t last. Lol idk maybe they don’t care. If it isn’t a problem why care? If it became an issue though they’d lock it down so fast lol

    • baseless_discourse@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      China has indeed blocked tiktok, but their version, douyin likely runs on similar systems and have similar types of contents. These two versions just don’t share content and probably have different moderation and privacy policies.

      I think you are confusing the tiktok block with the computer game ban, which requires excessive verifications (even biometric) to play games. And underaged children can only play games in assigned time slots with time limit:

      In 2019, the country imposed a cybercurfew barring those under 18 from playing games between 10 p.m. and 8 a.m.

      Recognizing that wily teenagers might try to use their parents’ devices or identities to circumvent the restrictions, the Chinese internet conglomerate Tencent said this week that it would close the loophole by deploying facial recognition technology in its video games.

      https://www.nytimes.com/2021/07/08/business/video-game-facial-recognition-tencent.html

    • cm0002@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Meh, entirely different type of SM, what we really need is the defederated version of TT

      But video is expensive so it probably won’t happen for a long time

      Now if TT redoes their app to be defederated to evade US law that would be hilarious

      • WamGams@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        Supposedly Pixelfed or Peertube just added shorts.

        A big issue with that is when I signed up to peertube 10 months ago, literally the only videos I could find were French language protestors.

      • Cethin@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        I saw a post for this service yesterday I think. I don’t remember the name of it or I’d post a link, but it is created now and I think it’s active, or will be soon. It’s only for short-form video though, like TikTok, which isn’t my style of content.