The United States federal government allocates a staggering $38 billion annually to prop up the meat and dairy industries. These subsidies significantly reduce the price of meat products, including hamburgers. Research from 2015 reveals that these subsidies slash the price of a pound of hamburger meat from $30 to the $5 we see today

  • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    You don’t want to even start to look into subsidies for things like grain and corn. The subsidies for those are higher than the beef and dairy industry.

        • capital@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          More overall to feed it to cattle since that will always have us growing more plants than we would otherwise.

        • delirious_owl@discuss.online
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          Zero.

          The natives that cultivated corn never used petrochemicals. They planted beans with the corn, which provides all the nitrogen needed.

          • Everythingispenguins@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            Yes planting the three sisters is a great way to farm in the arid west. It also requires the crops to be hand planted, weeded and harvested. There is no way that this could be done on a large enough scale to feed the current population or even the population 50 years ago.

            There is a reason monocroping and petrochemical fertilizer exists. It is the most harmful form of farming, but is also the one way that enough food can be grown.

            I dislike the current farming system, but to go back 100+ years to a time. When the only way to have the labor needed to farm was sharecropping or worse doesn’t seem like a solution to me.

            • delirious_owl@discuss.online
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              5 months ago

              The reason it exists is because less people contribute to the growing process.

              Its entirely false to think that we cannot feed our existing population without mechanized monocropping. We just need every able bodied person to contribute a few weeks out of the year to the fields. It is a shift, bit its not asking much.

              Stop spreading misinformation. We don’t need oil. We van easily feed everyone with sustainable methods. What we can’t do is keep burning fossil fuels.