The studio behind John Wick and The Hunger Games has reinstated the use of masks after several employees tested positive for Covid-19

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    47
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    If something is truly beneficial, then the public will freely adopt it

    Sort of like how the public freely adopted using seat belts and speed limits, right?

    • Kalcifer@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Speed limits, and seat belts are not equivelant examples. A speed limit is a restriction on risk to others, and property, a seatbelt is a reduction on the risk to only oneself, unless one has passengers, but even that has its logical limits. I can perhaps see the parallel you are drawing with speed limits, but I’m not entirely sure that it is necessarily an accurate comparison to make. To speed requires willful intent to endanger. As such, I could see it being argued that it is a violation of the Non-Aggression Principle. Not wearing a mask, however, is really only willful intent to endanger anothor if one is knowingly ill, and willfully spreads it to others (and, if so, it should be punished accordingly); however, if one is not knowingly ill, then there is no aggression.

        • Kalcifer@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Hm, that is a fair point. Perhaps it should come down to reasonably articulable suspicion of public endangerment. You are quite right that ignorance of one’s wrongdoing is no excuse. So perhaps I should restate what I had originally said to instead be that one should only be held accountable if they are spreading a communicable disease to others if they could, on reasonable grounds, be aware of their illness prior to spreading it.